Dancing with the starz to that fattie, he effing had it come on now. /homo sounding anger
How did Steve-O lose???
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Pity post
SILBER COMBAT UNIT DELTA (M-Technic Marshal)
RTFM:http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=56950 -
-
-
Maybe his ass cheeks were still stapled together.The Keystone Killers
Originally posted by CabrioletWith 73k+ post, you'd think he'd have learned a little about life.Comment
-
the fact you admit watching "dancing with the stars" is frightening
i bet farbin watches that shitComment
-
Comment
-
Don't lie, she can withhold the dry old people loving from you, otherwise you'd be sitting in the kitchen jerking off to photos of Farbin whilest coyote hunting.
Oh wait...1985 325e 2.8 Turbo VEMSComment
-
He rocked the biggest comb over I had ever seen and he had warts on his eye lids.
True story.Comment
-
its blatantly obvious you have a lot to learn. old married people dont have sex you fool
ask your parents they are afraid they will create another you
Comment
-
My science teacher told us he met his super forign asian girlfriend on a bus. But we all knew she was mail order. One day I stole my friends pen and licked it so he couldn't take it back as a joke. The teacher saw this and called my mom on speaker phone infront of the whole class. My teacher got a insane earfull infront of the whole class for calling my mom at work to tell me something so retarded. I think my moms works were "Are you fucking retarded, go teach my son some fucking science and don't call me at work for stupid shit"
It was the highlight of my highschool career.
My appologies. I guess this fact is in the same book as girls don't poo, fart, or have hair from the neck down and there vaginas are closed for 5 days of the month for maintainance.1985 325e 2.8 Turbo VEMSComment
-
I'm suprized Steve-O can dance at all.
What exactly is this "Dancing with the Stars" TV shit anyway?I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
Comment