Prop 8

[z31maniac]

Troll like a pro

I thought it was funny as hell, hope you got that.

[briansjacobs]

yes, and being a civil issue means its subject of the law of the various states

it can not be a matter of states interest if it limits the citizens federal rights.

[Naplm00]

Troll like a pro

[z31maniac]

Josh dont blame the Gays for wanting gay marrige or equal rights, blame the straight couples for having gay babies. lol

P&R quote of the year, ladies and gentlemen.

[Naplm00]

You can take what the judge said and apply it to a father and son being married as well. Or mother and daughter.

No wonder this country is heading for the shit hole.

Josh dont blame the Gays for wanting gay marrige or equal rights, blame the straight couples for having gay babies. lol

[Naplm00]

kind of funny choice of words, considering "god" is the reason for prop 8 in the first place

Yea that was the point...just stirring up shit, seeing who floats to the top

josh and the other usual suspects are here

[KenC]

yes, and being a civil issue means its subject of the law of the various states
this ruling by a gay judge will be overturned

14th Amendment.

[CorvallisBMW]

yes, and being a civil issue means its subject of the law of the various states
this ruling by a gay judge will be overturned

The defendants in the case had the chance to ask the judge to abstain and to get a new one before the trial even began, but they decided not to. I think that says a lot about the quality of this judge and the faith people have in him if even the Prop8 supporters were OK with him hearing the case. Not that him being gay has anything to do with it. The ruling will stand because the furthest it will go is the 9th circuit court, and judging by their history on these kinds of issues they will side with the previous ruling. The Supreme Court has already indicated that they won't take up this issue b/c they see it as a matter for the states to decide on their own, not the feds.

[gwb72tii]

Anybody read the judge's ruling?

It's not a state vs fed issue. State laws can't violate the Constitution... even if they're approved by popular vote.

Marriage is a civil issue, at least as far as the legality of the union is concerned. The legalization of same-sex marriage doesn't force any religious group to accept it.

Anybody else think that it's ridiculous that we're even voting on these propositions in 2010?

yes, and being a civil issue means its subject of the law of the various states
this ruling by a gay judge will be overturned

[joshh]

What would Xenu say?

You'd have to ask a Scientologist....still no answer.

[joshh]

Joshh is just like AIDS,
1.ignore him and he will go away.
2.are real pain in the ass
3. fill in the blank, how far will this go?

Funny you bring up AIDS.

[BraveUlysses]

That still didn't answer the question. As expected.

What would Xenu say?

[z31maniac]

Anybody read the judge's ruling?

It's not a state vs fed issue. State laws can't violate the Constitution... even if they're approved by popular vote.

Marriage is a civil issue, at least as far as the legality of the union is concerned. The legalization of same-sex marriage doesn't force any religious group to accept it.

Anybody else think that it's ridiculous that we're even voting on these propositions in 2010?

I did not read the judge's ruling, but we are in agreement quite a bit lately.

It's completely ridiculous this is still even an issue.

[briansjacobs]

Joshh is just like AIDS,
1.ignore him and he will go away.
2.are real pain in the ass
3. fill in the blank, how far will this go?

[joshh]

Not falling for your shitty fallacious arguments. So sorry.

I'd give your trolling a 3/10. Too obvious.

That still didn't answer the question. As expected.