Net Neutrality

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GG///M3
    replied
    At the end of the days its still TRUMP 2020

    Leave a comment:


  • kickinindian
    replied
    Lol I'm not laughing I'm just nihilistic I know that's what's a realistic possibility. I think (too lazy to look for article) the UK already kind of does it, if I'm not mistaken.

    Sent from my E6810 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Massive Lee
    replied
    Originally posted by kickinindian
    Until some religious group (evangelicals) gets offended enough and wants all porn throttled and wont allow pay packages.
    Don't laugh. Evangelicals account for 33% of the US population and 81% of them voted for Trump and support him unconditionally. King Doritos will do anything to keep their support. Including calling Jerusalem the capital of Israel (which he did last week) and why not banning what creates most of the the internet traffic : free porn. ;-)

    Leave a comment:


  • supermansocks95
    replied
    So, maybe I'll get with friends and pool up money and just jerk off at their house.

    Leave a comment:


  • kickinindian
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneEuroE30
    So i’ll just have to buy the pornhub package

    Until some religious group (evangelicals) gets offended enough and wants all porn throttled and wont allow pay packages.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneEuroE30
    replied
    Originally posted by decay
    they're enabled to.



    the best analogy i can make is- you know how comcast or whoever your cable provider is has packages that they charge you for if you want to watch certain channels?



    your ISP can do that with the internet now.


    So i’ll just have to buy the pornhub package

    Leave a comment:


  • decay
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneEuroE30
    So if i understand this correctly. They are charging money to visit certain sites? Christ sakes i wont even be able to blow my load with out having to pay for it.
    they're enabled to.

    the best analogy i can make is- you know how comcast or whoever your cable provider is has packages that they charge you for if you want to watch certain channels?

    your ISP can do that with the internet now.

    Leave a comment:


  • MR E30 325is
    replied
    Tis a sad day.

    ThatOneEuroE30, I think that might be the very beginning.

    The internet is a tremendous, unmatched, resource that allows people across all lines to communicate. Giving corporations the ability to freely restrict certain websites (reddit pops into my head immediately) does not have a happy feeling associated with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneEuroE30
    replied
    So if i understand this correctly. They are charging money to visit certain sites? Christ sakes i wont even be able to blow my load with out having to pay for it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wschnitz
    replied
    Well Rip

    Leave a comment:


  • Wschnitz
    replied


    Just remember, no one actually cares about keeping this law - Ajit Pai

    Leave a comment:


  • GAbOS
    replied
    Originally posted by Schnitzer318is
    It's okay... they've got a guy that can take care of this.
    Considering who their previous CEO was, I doubt anything will come of it either.

    Originally posted by Schnitzer318is
    I'm curious to see what's going to happen when EVERYONE is using a VPN.
    They will do what they have done in the past and start blacklisting VPN providers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Schnitzer318is
    replied
    Originally posted by GAbOS
    https://arstechnica.com/information-...deo-to-10mbps/

    Verizon is still technically under Title II and it's laws so this could get interesting.
    It's okay... they've got a guy that can take care of this.

    Though after reading the article it seems to only affect mobile devices... I'm curious to see what's going to happen when EVERYONE is using a VPN. We all know how much the security agencies will love that.

    Leave a comment:


  • GAbOS
    replied


    Verizon is still technically under Title II and it's laws so this could get interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wschnitz
    replied
    This right here is insane:

    The Federal Communications Commission intends to keep secret more than 200 pages of documents related to an alleged cyberattack that the agency says


    The governments commission on Internet changes didn't document the biggest DDoS they have ever encountered? More like it didn't happen. Especially considering their ISP is noted for having survived many huge DDoS attacks in the past.

    A quick Google shows they were not even down that day;

    Even more obvious evidence was posted by this user on reddit:



    At this point its pretty obvious Ajit Pai still works for Verizon, and by extension the rest of the big name ISPs.

    Leave a comment:

Working...