I would just like to chime in and say one thing: I think someone mentioned HP/L before when we were talking about Hondas. This statistic literally means nothing. A 200 lb, 100 hp, 1 liter engine has no advantages over a 200lb, 100 hp, 2 liter engine. A more accurate statistic to use would be hp/lb or hp/mpg or something along those lines.
Although I find it funny that some BMW guys rag on Hondas when their engine design principles have many parallels (or at least they used to). The f20 in an s2000 is a high revving, low displacement, NA engine with a lot of power up top. The s54 (and many M engines) is a high revving, low displacement, NA engine.
Hondas can be good in their own right but they could never compare to an e30 in driving feel and affordability (for me at least, show me a Honda I could buy rust free and running for $700 and have it last a long time)
Although I find it funny that some BMW guys rag on Hondas when their engine design principles have many parallels (or at least they used to). The f20 in an s2000 is a high revving, low displacement, NA engine with a lot of power up top. The s54 (and many M engines) is a high revving, low displacement, NA engine.
Hondas can be good in their own right but they could never compare to an e30 in driving feel and affordability (for me at least, show me a Honda I could buy rust free and running for $700 and have it last a long time)
Comment