Leche

[NuthinFancy]

Thats just one of the sickest volvos ive seen in a while. And the pics came out great.

[freeride53]

nickpro.

[Dude]

lol

Ill PM you later, i gotta run right now.

[daniel]

it's not a bad picture, don't get me wrong. I just think a different DOF would've made the picture more apealing in my mind. There's a sweet spot and I think a wider apeture could've achieved that. Just my opinion..

your opinion is wrong, lol

[daniel]

I used to have the 50 1.4, its a great lens, maybe better then the 85. Either way the 85 is alot less useful then the 50. For me the 85 is pretty much a portrait only lens. So unless portraiture is your thing, stick with the 50 (i wish i could have both)

A 70-200 is a great lens. Really expensive though, unless your shooting sports or something else where you dont have time to change lenses or your shooting lots of candids its kinda not worth it. I have a tokina 50-135 2.8 to KINDA do the 70-200's job but for cheaper becuase most of my shots are setup and im not in a hurry to change focal lengths. Plus primes put zoom lenses to shame in terms of speed/distortions,light weight,and sharpness.

wanna trade your 85 1.8D for my 50 1.4D +$50? seriously. PM me if you wanna. i love the 50, but i actually am doing a lot of portraits and have been looking for an 85.

[Mike The Bavarian]

What are shutter speeds for?
Why would he want to change the DOF? Would that have made it more in focus?

it's not a bad picture, don't get me wrong. I just think a different DOF would've made the picture more apealing in my mind. There's a sweet spot and I think a wider apeture could've achieved that. Just my opinion..

[lolcantturn]

allowed more light into the lense and also would've changed the DOF.

What are shutter speeds for?
Why would he want to change the DOF? Would that have made it more in focus?

[Mike The Bavarian]

allowed more light into the lense and also would've changed the DOF.

[lolcantturn]

sure i do. the picture is dark and the front of the car is out of focus. you should've used a wider apeture.

What would a wider aperture done?

[Mike The Bavarian]

You dont know what your talking about

sure i do. the picture is dark and the front of the car is out of focus. you should've used a wider apeture.

[lolcantturn]

You dont know what your talking about

Seriously hahahahaha

[325ix]

I love the color combo and the badgeless grill!

[Dude]

But yeah, when i do get to whip out the 85 i love it

[Dude]

i want that 85. my 50 1.4 isn't cutting it anymore for portraits. but then i remember how i also want the 70-200 and should probably put the money toward an 85 toward a 70-200 instead.

I used to have the 50 1.4, its a great lens, maybe better then the 85. Either way the 85 is alot less useful then the 50. For me the 85 is pretty much a portrait only lens. So unless portraiture is your thing, stick with the 50 (i wish i could have both)

A 70-200 is a great lens. Really expensive though, unless your shooting sports or something else where you dont have time to change lenses or your shooting lots of candids its kinda not worth it. I have a tokina 50-135 2.8 to KINDA do the 70-200's job but for cheaper becuase most of my shots are setup and im not in a hurry to change focal lengths. Plus primes put zoom lenses to shame in terms of speed/distortions,light weight,and sharpness.

[JdmEuroNorth]

That car is fucking BAD ASS.

I love it.