For the same cross sectional area, a single pipe will flow better than two pipes, since fluid dynamics assumes the flow at the surface of a pipe is almost zero due to a boundary layer.
1 2.5" single pipe = less surface than 2 1.75" pipes, but comparable flow cross sections. Less cost too, though 2 pipes looks cooler than a single pipe
1 2.5" single pipe = less surface than 2 1.75" pipes, but comparable flow cross sections. Less cost too, though 2 pipes looks cooler than a single pipe


i swapped and s52 into my e30 and wanted to gain the most possible power with all bolt-ons before doing heavy internal upgrades or any forced induction...the stock exhaust on the s52 m3 comes with 2: 2 1/4" pipes going all the way from the header back, so because of a lack of room, i'm running a custom 6-1 turbo manifold as my header, which has a 3" opening, when we first got the car started with only the header on, the car sounded like a dragster and didn't perform as great as expected it to...the answer was the exhaust, i was losing WWWWAAAAAAAYYYYYY too much back pressure, keeping no gas velocity in the system, essentially running way too lean....i opted to match up a 3" exhaust pipe all the way back, with a 3" vibrant high flow cat, a 3" borla hollow race muffler as a resonator, and finally a 3" vibrant street power turbo muffler, results were amazing, gained lots of back pressure, throttle response, etc....granted most people doing the swap will run 1: 2.5" pipe straight to the muffler, i felt that would create excess back pressure, and with the turbo manifold, i wanted to be able just to chop the exhaust later and add a turbo...so from my experience going bigger in exhaust helps, but my car is quite loud...yet it has the sexiest exhaust note i have ever heard:woowoo:
Comment