e30 autox car. v8 vs s52 vs m52 turbo

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brew
    No R3VLimiter
    • Oct 2003
    • 3060

    #31
    Originally posted by whiltebeitel
    S50 is heavier. The 2.8 aluminum block is the only one that may be lighter than the M20.
    Yes, but the guy who started the thread was asking us to compare a turbo m50/2 to a NA s50.
    '91 318is
    sigpic

    Comment

    • Massive Lee
      R3V OG
      • Sep 2006
      • 6782

      #32
      Turbo engine = lag = Not good for autocross.

      Just my 02 cents.
      Brake harder. Go faster. No shit.

      massivebrakes.com

      http://www.facebook.com/pages/Massiv...78417442267056





      Comment

      • Firestorm
        Mod Crazy
        • Jul 2004
        • 795

        #33
        No prizes for whoever guesses my answer.

        Lsx/t56 Swap progress |----------| .0000000005% - Well below poverty line.
        Getting purists panties in a knot since 2007. ;)
        E30 count = 6! :shock:

        Comment

        • papajetta
          Advanced Member
          • Jun 2006
          • 155

          #34
          thanks 4 the feedback guys,. i'll give the 2 door some thought. i think i might have not been sure of what i really wanted. what i really want is a weekend warrior which i can auto x and get better results than my e34, but i dont really want to get rid of my vert, its the perfect second car. Plus whatver i do to the vert i can transfer to a coupe in the future when i can. ( engine, suspension )
          places i auto x verts are allowed,
          lag isnt good for auto x but i have seen great results from low lag turbo setups. ex : evos, sti, mazda speed miata, mr2...
          but i do recognize all motor is better, and the traction issues with e30.
          i dont have the space to have 3 cars, and defintely dont want my second car to be a stripped down skeleton with 1 seat , a whole bunch of bars running across my face, sitting on r's permanently.

          Comment

          Working...