Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

To the people of R3v...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by Jonny Cash View Post
    That you're a pre-madonna.
    prima donna. does "before madonna" make any sense to you?

    what are you trying to say?
    http://instagram.com/dslovn.drives

    Comment


      #17
      Get a Bentley and use it.

      1991 325ic and 1991 318is

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by daniel View Post
        prima donna. does "before madonna" make any sense to you?

        what are you trying to say?

        I was gonna say the same thing, but I didn't want to be branded as a post whore.

        Comment


          #19
          you have too many posts in this thread.

          Comment


            #20
            5 of 20 puts me at a 25% success rate.

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by daniel View Post
              prima donna. does "before madonna" make any sense to you?
              thank you
              1989 cirrisblau-metallic 325i

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by Jonny Cash View Post
                I dont want to leave the wrong impression. This site's entertaining, you guys crack me up. And there's some great info and build threads on the site.

                But Ive noticed theres a select handful of guys who give tech advice based off of what they've read on the internet, instead of what theyve experienced hands on. IMO, this has resulted in a whole crapload of misinformation on the site. Sometimes when I search for things I want a second opinion on, cant figure out, or need certain specs, 90% of the time I have to skim through four pages of garbage to pick and choose what I think the accurate post is.

                In other words, know wtf you're talking about before you post. Remember that game you played in elementary school where everyone sat in a 1/2 circle? The teacher whispered a secret to the first student, everyone was instructed to whisper the same thing to the next person? By the time the message gets to the last person, its a completely different story?

                If you noobs keep it up, thats what this will turn into.
                Yes, and furthermore: A long time forum member, owner of a BMW or two and a high post count does not make you a Tech.

                I have been a BMW Technician for close to 30 years and have seen some things in in forums that have made me alternately laugh out loud and cringe.
                I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃xS : φ(x)) → (∀xS : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by Liam View Post
                  Yes, and furthermore: A long time forum member, owner of a BMW or two and a high post count does not make you a Tech.

                  I have been a BMW Technician for close to 30 years and have seen some things in in forums that have made me alternately laugh out loud and cringe.
                  What are YOU trying to say?

                  Comment


                    #24
                    I r tech

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View Post
                      What are YOU trying to say?
                      Trying? I think I said what I said, didn't I?

                      However, to your credit I have not seen you hand out any really stupid advice.

                      Originally posted by Danny View Post
                      I r tech
                      I is tech be the correcter term, damnit Danny get it right.
                      I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃xS : φ(x)) → (∀xS : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by Liam View Post
                        Trying? I think I said what I said, didn't I?

                        However, to your credit I have not seen you hand out any really stupid advice.



                        I is tech be the correcter term, damnit Danny get it right.

                        Me neither, in fact I think I remember some good advice from you. Not really sure what the guilty concious is about..
                        -Jay

                        2014 NASA FL se30 champ #81
                        2001 se46 3 year plan in progress


                        Comment


                          #27
                          I'm just playing the other side of the card.


                          (I did feel called out on the "million posts" quip)

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View Post
                            I'm just playing the other side of the card.


                            (I did feel called out on the "million posts" quip)
                            If you ever do get a million posts I'm calling the boy scouts to pull you out of the basement and take you to a mental hospital.
                            I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃xS : φ(x)) → (∀xS : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".

                            Comment


                              #29
                              A way that might help you get rid of some of the "less helpful" info is to just begin to compile a very large ignore list.
                              -tim
                              Originally posted by Jordan
                              I like the stance
                              -Coining hip terms since 10/9/03

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by Philo View Post
                                A way that might help you get rid of some of the "less helpful" info is to just begin to compile a very large ignore list.
                                Ignore doesn't really do much, because if someone who isn't on your list quotes someone that is, you still have to read it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X