Liberal violence.

[mar1t1me]

It wasn't race motivated, no robbery occured, and a bunch of far-lefties were protesting outside shortly before the attack.

Figure it out.

Purse stolen, boyfriend robbed.

Figure it out.

[E30 Cabrio]

Purse stolen, boyfriend robbed.

Figure it out.

BS - read the police report.

The purse was NOT stolen, and it was present when the female victim was being treated by paramedics and it disappeared well AFTER the assault.

Boyfriend robbed?

Source please.

Meanwhile, read the police report before making such ignorant claims.

Had you done so, you wouldn't have made your ignorantly false claims.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30045581/Police-Report-On-Allee-Bautsch-Incident-4-12-10

Purse is addressed on page 6/7 and on 7/7, where it states: "Purse was present on the scene and was not taken by the attackers"

Nothing in the police report about a missing wallet.

What's your source for that claim?

BTW, this guy was at the protest preceding the attack:



One of the attackers was described as being:

"White Male/ Late 20's/6'1" - thin build, thin face/Dark Brown Beard, Dark Red Pony tail hair style/Light colored T shirt, Dark pants."
Also described to be "dirty looking, but not homeless"

Subjects were also shouting "class-warfare" type slurs - "rich bitch" etc...

I'll bet anyone here a week's pay these lefty Anarchist's are responsible for the attack and the guy in the pic is the guy described by the vic.

[E30 Cabrio]

As for "Racism" at Tea Parties, a majority of it is coming from lefties masquerading as Tea Partiers.

If there was so much racism taking place at the TPs, then the truth would prevail and the left wouldn't feel the need to create "racism" where it didn't exist, or to make mountains out of molehills.

I know logic isn't the left's strong point, but try to follow it anyway.

Funny how the MSM ignored all the death threats and calls for Bush's assassination at lefty protests for 8 years, (not to mention the violence) yet they hyperventilate over a bunch of old-people getting together waving the American flag.

Where was the MSM?

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621

Just one example of many:

[mar1t1me]

BS - read the police report.

The purse was NOT stolen, and it was present when the female victim was being treated by paramedics and it disappeared well AFTER the assault.

Boyfriend robbed?

Source please.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/16/new-orleans-cops-search-assailants-attacked-jindals-campaign-aide/

You remember Fox, right? They're the network about which you've spent an entire thread touting their virtues. And now you don't believe them?

Bautsch's mother told Fox News on Friday that her daughter was not robbed, but her boyfriend was "after she was screaming on the ground."
The suspects stole Bautsch's purse and ran off, Bautsch's mother said.


So the police can't find the purse, yet they conclude the attackers didn't take it? Mom says one thing, the cops say another?



Isn't New Orleans home to one of the most ill-run corrupt PDs in the US?


Are we to assume the police report is a perfectly executed bit of investigation and the mom is full of shit?



Anyway, since you've selected your perpetrator, tried him on the basis of looks + proximity, and delivered a judgment, I'll let you be.


Of course, if your right, I'll even apologize. I think it's cute how you brand me a lefty because I don't subscribe to your view of the world. How typical.

[E30 Cabrio]

Did you read the police report?

First you said the purse was stolen. Are you now backing off that statement?

According to the police report: "Purse was present on the scene and was not taken by the attackers"

The purse was present when the female vic was being treated at the scene and was either left behind or lost in the confusion, or stolen afterward.

And where in the police report does it state that the b/f's wallet was stolen, or is that just speculation?

The police report clearly states that the purse was present when the female vic was being treated by paramedics, as she was resting her head on it.

You didn't read the police report I provided, did you?

Please don't be so intellectually lazy.

It's not hard to click a link and read a few pages to get the facts.

"Mom" wasn't there and is reporting early, second-hand info that has since been refuted with facts.

BTW, she is also now saying that it was the lefty's that attacked her daughter, based on her daughter's words.

Are you going to selectively dismiss that statement by "Mom"?

Regardless, the police report says the purse was NOT stolen during the attack or by the attackers, but was stolen/misplaced after the victim was treated at the scene, and there is no police report stating that b/f's wallet was stolen.

And the lefty protester that was there shortly before the attack sure fits the description of one of the attackers.

To a tee.

Again, no racial component and no robbery took place.

Robbery was not a motive. Race was not a motive.

Attackers were shouting much of the same rhetoric as the protesters were earlier in the evening.

Figure it out.

Lefty protesters outside the place where the event was held were protesting against "the rich", and they had even chased a group of Jindal supporters less than an hour before the attack.

Like I said, this only exposes the hypocrisy of the MSM, who also were nearly as silent about the Kenneth Gladney attack (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5Q3p...eature=related) by SEIU thugs, not to mention 65 year old Bill Rice, who had his fingers bitten off by a MoveOn.org member as well.

Yet the MSM is hyperventilating about the "possibility" of violence by TP members, while ignoring proven violent actions by the left, again exposing their hypocrisy and bias.

SEIU: Purple shirted people beaters.

BTW, where did I "select your perpetrator, tried him on the basis of looks + proximity, and delivered a judgment"

I didn't. I posted a pic of a man that fits the description to a tee who was at the demonstration shortly before the attack, spewing the same rhetoric that the attackers were and I said I'm willing to bet that man is one of the attackers based on the information available.

I think most reasonable people would be able to put two and two together and come to a similar conclusion.

Much different than saying "That's him, he's guilty!" although I'm willing to be that he is as opposed to him being innocent.

I'm saying that's my main suspect based on facts and logic, such as physical description, motive, proximity to the attack in both location and time, etc...

[Norwegiandane]

This has nothing to do with being liberal or conservative. It has to do with mental stability. People use violence when they are unable to articulate themselves.

E30 Cabrio, where is your proof that liberals are infiltrating Tea Bagger protests and acting racist?

[mar1t1me]

I read the report.

Brown says nothing in the police report about hearing "rhetoric" during the attack. As opposed to your statement that the "attackers used the same rhetoric as the protesters". It is not in the police report to which you directed me.

So the purse wasn't stolen by the same people who attacked them, or was it? The cops don't know where the hell it went. Neither does anyone else.

I'll give you that it may not have been a robbery, per se. The details are hazy-the cops took at least 72 hours to even cough up a report.

The rest is pure, unmitigated supposition on your part.

Hell, even Michelle Malkin hasn't gone there.

[Kansas]

As opposed to Eric Cantor's office that was shot at. And the officer and horse here in portland that were injured by liberal anti cop protesters. Nope liberals are peaceful people.

Cantor's office was not shot at. An office in the bottom floor of his building had a window shot out (in the middle of the night) by a stray round that had been fired into the air across town. That's according to the Richmond police.

Figure it out.

Correlation does not equal causation.

As for "Racism" at Tea Parties, a majority of it is coming from lefties masquerading as Tea Partiers.

Proof?

[mar1t1me]

As for "Racism" at Tea Parties, a majority of it is coming from lefties masquerading as Tea Partiers.

That's awfully convenient isn't it? Easy to point fingers and say "it's lefties" or whatever. As if all Tea Partiers have exactly the same platform. They don't any more than all MoveOn members advocate the biting of hands....

Pssst! Here's the real sinister part:

Actually all Tea Party members are lefties trying to secretly insert a false sense of security into the election hopes of Republicans nationwide. Lefties, acting in lockstep solidarity are planning to deliver the death blow in the upcoming elections by going to the polls and shouting "fooled you" when voting for Dems while wearing GOP regalia. The allegedly racist protesters are actually righties intent on derailing this horribly Socialist agenda. Don't you see it? All the evidence points to this! Pundits agree!

Or maybe not.

[joshh]

Cantor's office was not shot at. An office in the bottom floor of his building had a window shot out (in the middle of the night) by a stray round that had been fired into the air across town. That's according to the Richmond police.

They think. Big difference. But you're assuming the opposite right off the bat. It was actually unclear. But do you want to bring up semantics or do I need to point out he also recieved death threats?

Proof?

Tell you what shiney, you show proof of all these horrible violent tea partiers and I'll show you the Arizona immigration rally violence.