Done deal.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
EvolutionZen.com
Collapse
X
-
EvolutionZen.com
Last edited by Liam; 08-22-2009, 08:10 PM.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Tags: None
-
Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View PostSomeone could buy it and sell lots of aircraft grade rivets, and mil-spec wiring connectors. GLWS.
I have a lot of neat shit like that laying around I'm selling as well.... Want to buy a set of titanium rods for your M42?I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".
Comment
-
Why selling?
Will you still be selling your braces?
SILBER COMBAT UNIT DELTA (M-Technic Marshal)
RTFM:http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=56950
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dillinger View PostThe owner of that site got a lot of shit for posting in here about lightening bmws. Alot of what he said wasnt believe and alot of it has become legend both for and against him.
SC*AR
Originally posted by JamesE30And with a car looking like yours I imagine the balance shall tip in the favor of insult, like a big fat fucking retarded fucking black girl on a see-saw, opposite... a dwarf.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alkasquawlik View PostI remember that thread.
Everyone remembers that thread... All taken way out of context at any rate.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stephen View Posti want frankencars motor. or m20 bits.
Or the top secret uber-kool shit...
Just getting out of Internet sales.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".
Comment
Comment