-
I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true". -
Surprise
I have 3 NOS USA Made hood kits Available $30 Shipped via USPS Priority to the Lower 48.
And
3 NOS China Made hood kits Available for $20 Shipped via USPS Priority to the lower 48.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
You are alive...Comment
-
Last edited by Liam; 07-19-2010, 12:32 PM.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
no trunk kits? =(Comment
-
Last edited by Liam; 07-19-2010, 02:45 PM.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
i'll take 2! whats your paypal?
also, are the USA ones free of any defects?Comment
-
No defects. Just held back from sale.
No instructions either you know how they are installed right?
AND very important don't stretch the material when you are installing them because they will lift after a while if you do.
The ones on my IS have been there since May of 2007 with no problems.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
one last question. How does these affect how water drains from your car?Comment
-
I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
Aha...
I found instruction sheet for these
You can see them here:
EDIT: Only 1 US Made Kit and the three China Kits left.Last edited by Liam; 07-19-2010, 02:15 PM.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
I'll take the US kit, PM me
thanksComment
-
Last edited by Liam; 07-19-2010, 04:40 PM.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
This stuff is shit and no one should buy it from this loser. In case anyone is unaware, this guy was banned as a different user after blatant and continuous lies compounded by even more hilariously blatant lies.
If you want to put this stuff on your car, go buy some weather strip shit from Lowes and stick it on your car. It's the same shit.
Comment
-
I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
Comment