zf transmission, so what diff?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • e30s52
    replied
    I think he had the 3.25lsd

    Leave a comment:


  • e30polak
    replied
    Originally posted by jahnaboi
    So I put in my IE race bushings, ss braided lines, and my 2.93 lsd. I couldn't be happier.... 0 - 100 is so quick. I love it. And at 80 mph I'm at 3100 rpm. I love it!!!
    What diff were you running before, 2.73??? 3.25/3.46 ftmfw!!! :up:

    Leave a comment:


  • jahnaboi
    replied
    So I put in my IE race bushings, ss braided lines, and my 2.93 lsd. I couldn't be happier.... 0 - 100 is so quick. I love it. And at 80 mph I'm at 3100 rpm. I love it!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • e30polak
    replied
    Originally posted by Ray McCooney
    Could have sworn the stock ratio on an E36 M3 differential was 3.15.
    I believe that the stock diff was a 3.15 or a 3.25. I know the M Coupe came with a 3.23.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ray McCooney
    replied
    Could have sworn the stock ratio on an E36 M3 differential was 3.15.

    Leave a comment:


  • napabavarian
    replied
    Originally posted by Danny
    32000 rpms?

    Holy shit.

    Rotary?

    Leave a comment:


  • kevdeno
    replied
    Originally posted by DTRguy
    Mine has the Getrag e36 gearbox with a M50 non vanos using a 3.25 rear end gear. Honestly, getting sick of the high strung nature. I was looking to see what the E36 was using for a rear gear because I doubt anyone likes cruising at 70mph at 3200-3400rpm. Gets old pretty quick. Is there a noticable drop in acceleration when dropped to a 2.93?
    I have an M50 non-vanos as well. I tried 3.46 and changed to 2.93, my preference. Sure, you'll notice a little drop going 3.25 to 2.93, but like Uber E30 said, if you drive any highway miles it'll be worth it. The M50 non-vanos pulls quite strong at high RPMs, where I've found it's most fun because you get to spend a little more time in each gear taking advantage. With my 3.46, the short bursts in each gear used to be fun, but it got old driving like this every day.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uber E30
    replied
    2.93 is the stock diff unless it was an m3, then it was a 3.25. There will be a small drop, but if you do alot of highway then it will be worth it.


    OT: i use to live in Florence, did you go to BCHS?

    Leave a comment:


  • DTRguy
    replied
    Mine has the Getrag e36 gearbox with a M50 non vanos using a 3.25 rear end gear. Honestly, getting sick of the high strung nature. I was looking to see what the E36 was using for a rear gear because I doubt anyone likes cruising at 70mph at 3200-3400rpm. Gets old pretty quick. Is there a noticable drop in acceleration when dropped to a 2.93?

    Leave a comment:


  • e30polak
    replied
    Originally posted by kevdeno
    I have a ZF and have tried 3.46 and 2.93. I'm much happier with 2.93 because I do mostly commuting. And even still, the 2.93 is fun and fast. When I had the 3.46 in it felt too high strung. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone who would expects to be on the highway. It's really only suited best for around town or auto-crossing. I was using 5th gear in town at 40-50 mph. 80 mph was roughly 4000 RPMs.
    That's fine if you have a 6 speed, just pop it into 6th on the freeway/highway and enjoy better gas milage. The main reason I want a 6 speed, is to run a torquier rear end, while maintaining my current milage. I don't mind a little more shifting.

    Leave a comment:


  • vr4boy
    replied
    Originally posted by Aptyp
    32k, that's like formula 1 shit and then some

    3200 perhaps?
    big ooopsss missed a decimal point there:-)
    3.2k rpm or 3200 rpm....

    Leave a comment:


  • SpecM
    replied
    Originally posted by MIKe30
    there is the miscommunication, all other references to getrag's in this thread are referring to the getrag 260 from the e30 325, not e36 getrag
    yep the e36 trannies (g250/zf310/320) have simular ratios, but the e30 getrag 260 has 4th 1:1 and an overdrive

    Leave a comment:


  • kevdeno
    replied
    I have a ZF and have tried 3.46 and 2.93. I'm much happier with 2.93 because I do mostly commuting. And even still, the 2.93 is fun and fast. When I had the 3.46 in it felt too high strung. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone who would expects to be on the highway. It's really only suited best for around town or auto-crossing. I was using 5th gear in town at 40-50 mph. 80 mph was roughly 4000 RPMs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jesse30
    replied
    zf with 3.73 isnt that bad. you can drive it with it.


    i would look for a 3.46 though, or even 3.25..

    Leave a comment:


  • MIKe30
    replied
    Originally posted by gobuffs
    I was talking E36 trannies. It is my understanding that the Zf and Getrag ratios are so similar that they are interchangable.

    Getrag (92-95) ZF (96+)
    1 4.23 4.20
    2 2.52 2.49
    3 1.66 1.67
    4 1.22 1.24
    5 1.00 1.00
    there is the miscommunication, all other references to getrag's in this thread are referring to the getrag 260 from the e30 325, not e36 getrag

    Leave a comment:

Working...