Originally posted by nando
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FI vs stroker
Collapse
X
-
-
Yes, no. The N54 ports are shorter and are cast "as is", while the N52 ports are CNC'd like the S54. I was shocked when I looked up N54 flow charts - even ported, it flows about as well as a ported 885. It also has smaller valves.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by nando View PostFor example, the N54 appears to be the "top dawg" of turbo BMW platforms - but seriously, the heads flow about the same as an 885 M20.
Leave a comment:
-
I think what Nisse is saying - an engine with a higher N/A VE, will make more power for the same given boost level than an engine with a lower N/A VE. And I agree with that. :)
For example, the N54 appears to be the "top dawg" of turbo BMW platforms - but seriously, the heads flow about the same as an 885 M20. All it really has going for it is a stout bottom end and lots of aftermarket support - but those guys think that 500whp is the shit (on stock turbos, at 20+ PSI), but people have been doing that on turbo builds (M20, M50, S38, whatever) for ages with way less boost.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by berlow94 View PostI disagree with this.
A properly built high output NA motor will use completely different parts than a properly built high output boosted motor.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When you have a good NA motor, you just can't help to think how much better it would be with a turbo :D
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by berlow94 View PostThis thread is about a street driven IX... Neither 10k rpm S14's nor 700hp boosted S54's apply.
I stated my opinion, you guys are welcome to yours.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by berlow94 View PostYes, but find a dyno graph of a high output boosted s54. You won't find a single one in a race car driven on the track. Remember, torque wins races, not HP.
Especially on a street car, a useable power band is WAY better than having 700+ HP.
Driveability people!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
Love the physics lesson! I defer to ya'lls mechanically/engineering knowledge that clearly dwarfs mine, that's why I love this site!
To tie back to original thread topic; the power I'm looking for is reliable, usable, non-track power. IMO I enjoy the IX more when I am tearing up twisty country roads; AND maybe teaching the occasional high school kid with a Subaru STI a lesson every now and then lol.
This thread's convo has me bouncing slightly back to FI with <10lbs of boost....
Leave a comment:
-
that whole line (which is BS) ignores the fact that HP is just (torque * distance * time). Basically, torque is the force - HP is how much work (acceleration) you can do with that force. You can't have HP without torque.. Torque is useless without the distance and time factors. It makes no sense!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by berlow94 View PostRemember, torque wins races, not HP.
Sounds like someone lives their life a 1/4 mile at a time
The BMW powered F1 car of the 80's won the championship in 1983 with the 1.5l 1350hp turbo. Also, what about motorcycles?
Leave a comment:
-
This thread is about a street driven IX... Neither 10k rpm S14's nor 700hp boosted S54's apply.
I stated my opinion, you guys are welcome to yours.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by berlow94 View PostYes, but find a dyno graph of a high output boosted s54. You won't find a single one in a race car driven on the track. Remember, torque wins races, not HP.
Especially on a street car, a useable power band is WAY better than having 700+ HP.
Driveability people!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: