M20 Turbo
Collapse
X
-
As you now know, you can make tons of power on a stock m20b25. 8.8:1 compression is already relatively low.
My turbo m20 was a "2.7i" stroker. I wanted some buffer room for DIY tuning and crappy california 91 octane gas, and thought more displacement would do wonders. I wish I would have boosted my stock engine.
Now I'm building an m52 turbo at 9.5:1 CR
edit: oh, and lots of people who build "strokers" start out with ETA's. It's easy to swap out the head and electronics to get some more RPM's for the turbo.Comment
-
Well it's either I turbo the m20 sitting in my garage or the m50 sitting in a salvaged e36.
Which would be more beneficial to turbo?Originally posted by audiquattrotbimmers b4 b*tches....remember that.
2000 Audi S4 B5 Laser Red
1990 Nissan 240sx - Drift Missile
2006 CBR600RR
Comment
-
Comment
-
If it's a vanos m50, then I say go with that. More bolt on mods and tuning options. If it's a nonvanos, then I'd say stick with the m20. When you blow the m20, you can go 24v. That's what the cool kids do :pComment
-
Well it's a single vanos, and I've heard bad things about turboing thoseOriginally posted by audiquattrotbimmers b4 b*tches....remember that.
2000 Audi S4 B5 Laser Red
1990 Nissan 240sx - Drift Missile
2006 CBR600RR
Comment
-
http://www.e30tech.com/forum/showthread.php?t=59124
This guy is running 20psi on stock internals with head studs and metal gasket. Had this set-up for a year now-Andy
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by audiquattrotbimmers b4 b*tches....remember that.
2000 Audi S4 B5 Laser Red
1990 Nissan 240sx - Drift Missile
2006 CBR600RR
Comment
-
orly? Why is that? Less stock compression? dual valve springs? WOWzerz! The vanos m50's have more low end torque, meaning faster spool, longer rods, meaning higher revving, a lighter weight valve train, meaning less HP loss, and more tuning options.
I'm telling you otherwise. They're both decent for boost, but a nonvanos is pretty much a DOHC m20... you can really take advantage of the newer technology with vanos engines/ecu's.Comment
-
^^ True. But both the m20 and m50 have to be rebuilt, so I think I'm going to go with the m20 for now :)Originally posted by audiquattrotbimmers b4 b*tches....remember that.
2000 Audi S4 B5 Laser Red
1990 Nissan 240sx - Drift Missile
2006 CBR600RR
Comment
-
boost= non vanos
n/a= vanossigpicComment
-
If you can't figure out how to turn a switch on at a certain RPM/load, you should either not be boosting engines with standalone ECU's, or you should let good tuners like TRM tune the stock ecu for you.
Yes, nonvanos engines are more "beefy." Who the fuck cares? Since when are heavy rods better? The vanos engines are newer, better engineered engines.Last edited by lifeiskaos; 06-16-2010, 07:24 AM.Comment
-
^^ sounds pretty accurate. Lifeiskaos, how do you pass emissions with a turbo, or is your m52b30 going in like a track car?Originally posted by audiquattrotbimmers b4 b*tches....remember that.
2000 Audi S4 B5 Laser Red
1990 Nissan 240sx - Drift Missile
2006 CBR600RR
Comment
-
I'm no M20 expert but I'd recommend getting head studs and a head gasket for sure. And also think about some forged pistonsComment
Comment