Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trying to summarize Super eta (S-eta) stroker build info.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • phenryiv1
    replied
    Originally posted by supra89t View Post
    So, what if you just change the ECU and valve-springs to the i parts? Do you know of anyone who has done that and what the result was? I am sure it would peter out pretty quickly, but maybe daz germans designed some top-end flow into that cam...
    You won't get enough air and combustion will suffer.

    Leave a comment:


  • supra89t
    replied
    Originally posted by 884door View Post
    Putting the cam in is pointless without the intake and throttle body. The car might actually be slower because the cam shifts the powerband up the RPM range then you're not flowing enough air to make the power up there.

    PM Me if you need the TB and manifold for cheap.
    So, what if you just change the ECU and valve-springs to the i parts? Do you know of anyone who has done that and what the result was? I am sure it would peter out pretty quickly, but maybe daz germans designed some top-end flow into that cam...

    Leave a comment:


  • Stoner Sam23
    replied
    Ok thanks pics would deffinately help. my seta might be in the clear. it was built 3/87. I will look out for that durring the build. now i dont have to rebuild my existing I head with 250k on it i'll just sell that whole motor minus the mani's.

    Leave a comment:


  • 884door
    replied
    Originally posted by Stoner Sam23 View Post
    only some or all? can that be easily modified. does it have to be?
    Some. Rumor is the early SETAs have all 7 and later ones don't but my old one was built 9/87 and it had them.

    Any machine shop can add the extra oil holes in, and yes you have to have them to run an I cam. I'll dig up a pic in a while here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stoner Sam23
    replied
    only some or all? can that be easily modified. does it have to be?

    Leave a comment:


  • 884door
    replied
    Originally posted by Stoner Sam23 View Post
    Wow this is a very informative thread! is there a difference between the I and seta head? not talking springs,cam,rockers. is the core, porting, and valve sizes all the same?
    Other than some of the SETA heads not having all the cam bearing oil holes drilled they are the exact same casting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stoner Sam23
    replied
    Wow this is a very informative thread! is there a difference between the I and seta head? not talking springs,cam,rockers. is the core, porting, and valve sizes all the same?

    Leave a comment:


  • 884door
    replied
    Originally posted by supra89t View Post
    So the car will run and drive with the seta parts but performance will not be at 100% at the top end of the rev range due to the restriction posed by the seta parts, right?
    Putting the cam in is pointless without the intake and throttle body. The car might actually be slower because the cam shifts the powerband up the RPM range then you're not flowing enough air to make the power up there.

    PM Me if you need the TB and manifold for cheap.
    Last edited by 884door; 04-17-2010, 07:00 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • supra89t
    replied
    So the car will run and drive with the seta parts but performance will not be at 100% at the top end of the rev range due to the restriction posed by the seta parts, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • phenryiv1
    replied
    Originally posted by supra89t View Post
    OK, stupid question from the newb...I have an '88 seta and:

    325i 173 ECU
    325i valve springs & rockers
    325i cam
    325i air flow meter
    325i 3.0 fuel pressure regulator

    Do I *need* the i manifold, throttle body and TPS? Will the 173 ecu read the seta TPS properly? I guess the real question is are the i intake parts mandatory to make the car run or upgrades to the restrictive seta parts? My budget on this is super-tight so I need to re-use anything I can and upgrade later as funds come available.
    You really need the i IM and TB to get enough air in to increase power.

    Leave a comment:


  • supra89t
    replied
    Originally posted by Flash View Post
    If you have a super eta, this is all you need period....

    325i 173 ECU
    325i inner valve springs
    325i cam
    325i intake manifold
    325i throttle body
    325i throttle position switch
    325i intake bellows
    325i air flow meter
    325i 3.0 fuel pressure regulator
    325i vacuum line from brake booster, to bellows, and to throttle body side



    thats it, nothing more, nothing less.
    If your head is only drilled for 4 journals its like 20 bucks at a machine shop to get the additional holes drilled. You need a timing belt and tensioner, head gasket set, head bolt set, and water pump. Thats it.

    Im still surprised that with all this information available there is still so much misinformation.

    THIS is a definitive list for the super eta, its tried and true, other parts eliminated via realoem, you already have 325i injectors, wiring harness, pump etc...
    OK, stupid question from the newb...I have an '88 seta and:

    325i 173 ECU
    325i valve springs & rockers
    325i cam
    325i air flow meter
    325i 3.0 fuel pressure regulator

    Do I *need* the i manifold, throttle body and TPS? Will the 173 ecu read the seta TPS properly? I guess the real question is are the i intake parts mandatory to make the car run or upgrades to the restrictive seta parts? My budget on this is super-tight so I need to re-use anything I can and upgrade later as funds come available.

    Leave a comment:


  • twothrees
    replied
    My super eta budget stroker is done and is running very well. Seat of the pants says I picked up low and mid-range over my "I". I did get the flywheel lightened and do recommend that modification. It ended up at 13-14 lbs.

    I was stressing the last couple of days because it was running like shit; until I found out that #6 injector was un-plugged and #1 intake's eccentric was really loose, allowing the eccentric/rocker to bang on the valve stem. That was causing the knocking that was freaking me out. So much for adjusting the valves prior to installing the engine.

    OP, I hope yours turns out just as well.

    DD

    Leave a comment:


  • bataangpinoy
    replied
    i have a chip for a 153, but i dont want to install it.

    Leave a comment:


  • phenryiv1
    replied
    Originally posted by bataangpinoy View Post
    fyi the 153 dme has two boards in it, held together with plastic rivets. the 173 and 380 are single board units.

    i did the head swap on my seta powered 325is(blew the b25) with the head you sent me.
    pulls great, but gives me and idle issue when cold.
    just make sure that you use new vac hoses or prepare to suffer trying to chase out leaks and isle issues.
    I am glad that the head worked for you.

    There were discussions elsewhere regarding the 153 versus the 173/380, and as you pointed out, the software is the same, btu the single- versus double-boards make it more difficult to find a chip for the 153.

    Just a consideration for people considering the build.

    Leave a comment:


  • bataangpinoy
    replied
    fyi the 153 dme has two boards in it, held together with plastic rivets. the 173 and 380 are single board units.

    i did the head swap on my seta powered 325is(blew the b25) with the head you sent me.
    pulls great, but gives me and idle issue when cold.
    just make sure that you use new vac hoses or prepare to suffer trying to chase out leaks and isle issues.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X