Questions about my "budget" stroker build....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LavaSurfer
    Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 62

    #1

    Questions about my "budget" stroker build....

    I scored a M20 from a 325i for next to nothing for my 325e. And I'm throwing around build ideas in my head. Keep in mind this is a daily driver/fun car. I would like it to be "reliable", but I don't mind getting under the hood and messing around with it here and there.

    I'm looking at sourcing a M52B28 crank, eta rods, stock i pistons, Schrik 284 cam, Miller MAF conversion with the WAR chip (i would like the tuneability this offers, but don't think I want the headache of a MS or something similar), and the ebay header and catback exhaust that's on my eta now.

    The questions I have are mainly to do with the camshaft. With the added displacement would I be able to run a cam larger than the 284 without any major low end drawbacks?

    Also, any suggestions on some companies that sell rebuild "kits" (bearings, rings, gaskets) for a reasonable price
  • nando
    Moderator
    • Nov 2003
    • 34827

    #2
    yes, but you realistically don't want much more than the 288. And it could really use some special port work to cut down on turbulence above 11mm of lift (I don't know the specifics on this one, but there's a thread with flowcharts on E30tech).
    Build thread

    Bimmerlabs

    Comment

    • Danny
      Moderator
      • Feb 2008
      • 14216

      #3
      I was just about to ask the question.

      I'm mid way through collecting parts for this exact build.

      Comment

      • MR 325
        Moderator
        • Oct 2003
        • 37827

        #4
        If the head's off and you're building the stroker, I would definitely port the head as mentioned!
        BimmerHeads
        Classic BMW Specialists
        Santa Clarita, CA

        www.BimmerHeads.com

        Comment

        • nando
          Moderator
          • Nov 2003
          • 34827

          #5
          this thread:


          you want to copy whatever valve seat cut he did.. even the 284/272 would benefit.
          Build thread

          Bimmerlabs

          Comment

          • Danny
            Moderator
            • Feb 2008
            • 14216

            #6
            But the M52 crank + I pistons/eta rods puts the pistons at the stock deck height.

            Wouldn't an adjustable cam gear suffice?

            Comment

            • nando
              Moderator
              • Nov 2003
              • 34827

              #7
              hmm? an adjustable cam gear isn't going to fix intake port turbulence above 11mm of lift. the 284/272 and 288 both have 11.4mm of lift. ;)

              and you don't want to use a cam gear adjustment to fix valve clearance. you use that to set the timing of the cam for the best powerband.

              even if your pistons are at stock height, that doesn't mean you have enough clearance. a stock 2.5l doesn't have enough clearance for either the 288 or 284. it will hit the intake valve at TDC.
              Build thread

              Bimmerlabs

              Comment

              • Danny
                Moderator
                • Feb 2008
                • 14216

                #8
                Ahh I see, I read the valve seat as valve relief. Hence the WTF moment.

                Comment

                Working...