If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
With spacers. Wanted to try with them and hood closed, then without hood closed, but already over stayed the welcome on the dyno as it was. First few pulls, it was breaking up over 4500rpm, had to adjust the CPS closer to the wheel. Whodoo was kind enough to answer the phone and gave the tip. Figured it may be failing, but guess the MS is more sensitive than the stock ECU.
Glad that helped and you ended up with a successful session 8^)
To add, judging by the graph, I feel a larger cam would have kept pulling and not drop the lower end power by much, or maybe adjust timing instead but we used a stock fixed gear on this build.
With spacers. Wanted to try with them and hood closed, then without hood closed, but already over stayed the welcome on the dyno as it was. First few pulls, it was breaking up over 4500rpm, had to adjust the CPS closer to the wheel. Whodoo was kind enough to answer the phone and gave the tip. Figured it may be failing, but guess the MS is more sensitive than the stock ECU.
Most are mounted in an airbox but race bikes with open stacks can use one mounted near the mouth of the stacks to generally measure the temp of incoming air. I'm not suggesting you should necessarily do this, just curious of your reasoning. Most MC engines are a lot more compact compared to an inline 6 with butterflies 2 feet away from each other.
Not going to change the method of madness going on, just curious ;)
Who else would try Alpha-N on a an outdated 8-bit software. Not this guy.....OK so I tried hehe.
Most are mounted in an airbox but race bikes with open stacks can use one mounted near the mouth of the stacks to generally measure the temp of incoming air. I'm not suggesting you should necessarily do this, just curious of your reasoning. Most MC engines are a lot more compact compared to an inline 6 with butterflies 2 feet away from each other.
Thanks to Whodwho. Car is running great, needs more tweaking, but the MS is like playing Xbox compared to the Atari of Motronic 1.3, even without the IAT, MAP, or IAC.
This thing hauls some serious dirt. Can't wait to re-visit the dyno :)
Can't wait for results!
Why aren't you utilizing IAT? All of the Motorcycles i work on that are Alpha-n use IAT even if it is just a sensor near the throttle bodies.
Thanks to Whodwho. Car is running great, needs more tweaking, but the MS is like playing Xbox compared to the Atari of Motronic 1.3, even without the IAT, MAP, or IAC.
This thing hauls some serious dirt. Can't wait to re-visit the dyno :)
Hi John, that is a bit disappointing, thanks for sharing your efforts, there were a couple people waiting on these results to see if it could be done, but looks a little more complicated that one might think!. like you say the later model ecu's might have a much better chance of coping with the change.
Personally i have never tried to play with any std ecu on any car i have modified, stand alone is always the first thing then the world is your oyster!!!
still left us hanging now with the engine results!!
Interesting. I will be looking forward to seeing the Alpha-n map quality and driveability of a standalone vs what you were able to achieve with the Motronic 3.x ECU.
Leave a comment: