Anyone actually dyno compared MarkD vs JimC chip?

[z31maniac]

Like the title states.

[hoveringuy]

I don't think the results would really mean much. The better measure is in throttle response and part throttle driveability which are hard to measure on the dyno.

Dyno is just for bragging rights.

[3bvert]

I don't think the results would really mean much. The better measure is in throttle response and part throttle driveability which are hard to measure on the dyno.

Dyno is just for bragging rights.

agree

[z31maniac]

I don't think the results would really mean much. The better measure is in throttle response and part throttle driveability which are hard to measure on the dyno.

Dyno is just for bragging rights.

I agree as well, I'm just curious why everyone salivates all over the MarkD chip and ignores the JimC chip.

The only dyno I've seen is for the JimC chip and it picked up like 11hp/tq over stock chip. Not a bad improvement, especially if coupled with a lighweight flywheel.