With humor and a plethora of skepticism I ask, has anyone actually used one of those $200 electric superchargers and out of curiousity, what were the results??? Thanks
Has anyone actually tried an electric supercharger...?
Collapse
X
-
-
if you mean those pieces of shit that you put in your air intake, dyno results have proven time and time again that theyre completely useless. at least with magnets on your fuel lines theres a notable change.
if you mean some kind of electric motor powered supercharger on the otherhand, gimme links dammit. should work as long as it can spin RPMs as high as mechanically driven ones.: : 1984 318i : : PNW E30 Crew : : Sold!!
Now becoming the R3vlimited Pro3 car
http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=93780Comment
-
If you understand that an alternator is only like 60% efficient, adn an electric motor less so, you will see that the chance of making more power is just impossible.
Even a "Roots" type is better than that.
LukeComment
-
This is the only electric supercharger I know of that can actually produce results. Unfortunately it's only able to produce power for short durations due to the amount of power needed to produce the boost. So you have to activate it with a button like NOS.
The way I see it is if you are going to spend that kind of money on a supercharger you might as well get the real thing.Comment
-

Unlimited Slip Diff's FTW!
1972 240z Drift,Scca BSP, Scca ITS Car.
Comment
-
Thats a good point, but if you can force more air in, you can force more fuel in. If you can do that you can get more power while decreaseing efficiency. So I think you could get more power but your right, I wonder if thats the same for a belt driven supercharger. A turbo can increase power and efficiency, I bet a supercharger can't. Even if you could get power out of an electric supercharger the power gain vs. all the shit you would get for it wouldn't be worth it. I can't image taking that to an autocross and have them try to class it, you would never here the end of it.Originally posted by StereoInstaller1If you understand that an alternator is only like 60% efficient, adn an electric motor less so, you will see that the chance of making more power is just impossible.
Luke
stuComment
-
Superchargers loose 30% of their power through lack of efficiancy. I had an article somewhere that stated this. Turbos are a lot more efficient becuase they don't put any excess strain on the engine to operate. As opposed to a supercharger which uses belts run off the engine to create power.Comment
-
With just a really quick search it looks like most gas leafblowers will push a little over 320cfm of air. I'm pretty sure that even a stock m20b25 will pull something more than 500cfm. One of the problems with using a leaf blower to produce boost should be pretty obvious...
Comment
-
Both Superchargers and Turbos have there place regardless of efficiency.Originally posted by silverfbimmerSuperchargers loose 30% of their power through lack of efficiancy. I had an article somewhere that stated this. Turbos are a lot more efficient becuase they don't put any excess strain on the engine to operate. As opposed to a supercharger which uses belts run off the engine to create power.
Superchargers = More Power off the line but less top end.
Turbos = Harder to get power off the line but plenty of power to pull on the top end.Comment
-
twin turbo or... dare i say... triple turbo = moar powar off the line B): : 1984 318i : : PNW E30 Crew : : Sold!!
Now becoming the R3vlimited Pro3 car
http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=93780Comment



Comment