Here's my setup: GC springs/perches, 300F/475R, Koni SA(F), OE Boge(R)
Now, before we get into the issue of stock rear shocks, I never intended to use them, but the used ones I had waiting were shot when we went to mount them. Besides, the rear really isn't lowered more than an inch in the back, it was low with the stock springs. The front perches are set just about all the way down, though many on this forum with GC's and Konis are much lower. The rears are about an inch from the top of the range.
Here's the current stance:

My problem is the car is riding too damn stiff. On expansion joints and pavement irregularies, you can feel every groove. Over moderate-large potholes the front violently slams down. The rear isn't nearly as painful, and just about never bottoms out. I was messing around with the adjustments on the front shock, and found that they were set to full soft. I decided to start going firmer, which I assume would prevent the bottoming out on huge bumps, but those only made the "better" roads around here even worse. Basically I removed the chance of running out of range, but created an ungodly stiff ride for the rest of the time.
Now I ask, is my poor ride simply because the car is set too low? I can't imagine that, but it's the only possibility. If the springs are longer, the shock has more useable range, but do shocks naturally have a stiffer dampening towards the end of their travel? For example, if my shocks are sitting 50% down their available movement range, are they stiffer than if I started at 10% down, therefore the car being higher?
Any help is appreciated.
Now, before we get into the issue of stock rear shocks, I never intended to use them, but the used ones I had waiting were shot when we went to mount them. Besides, the rear really isn't lowered more than an inch in the back, it was low with the stock springs. The front perches are set just about all the way down, though many on this forum with GC's and Konis are much lower. The rears are about an inch from the top of the range.
Here's the current stance:

My problem is the car is riding too damn stiff. On expansion joints and pavement irregularies, you can feel every groove. Over moderate-large potholes the front violently slams down. The rear isn't nearly as painful, and just about never bottoms out. I was messing around with the adjustments on the front shock, and found that they were set to full soft. I decided to start going firmer, which I assume would prevent the bottoming out on huge bumps, but those only made the "better" roads around here even worse. Basically I removed the chance of running out of range, but created an ungodly stiff ride for the rest of the time.
Now I ask, is my poor ride simply because the car is set too low? I can't imagine that, but it's the only possibility. If the springs are longer, the shock has more useable range, but do shocks naturally have a stiffer dampening towards the end of their travel? For example, if my shocks are sitting 50% down their available movement range, are they stiffer than if I started at 10% down, therefore the car being higher?
Any help is appreciated.
Comment