Has anybody used Dodge end-links?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eLKuRLy
    Grease Monkey
    • Oct 2007
    • 360

    #1

    Has anybody used Dodge end-links?

    Wondering what other "upgrade" options we have for non-M FRONT swaybar end-links WithOut going to adjustables?
    From pictures, the Dodge Stratus ones look shorter...

  • nando
    Moderator
    • Nov 2003
    • 34827

    #2
    An upgrade would be mounting it to the strut instead of the control arm.
    Build thread

    Bimmerlabs

    Comment

    • joncrz
      Grease Monkey
      • Jul 2013
      • 364

      #3
      Originally posted by nando
      An upgrade would be mounting it to the strut instead of the control arm.
      dont flame me for asking but... why is that?





      My don't quote me list:

      Originally posted by george graves
      I could be wrong, but I don't think it's a smog test type of thing. IIRC think it's against CA law to *sell* a dual outlet muffler as a replacement for a car that came from the factory with a single. But don't quote me on that.

      Comment

      • AndrewBird
        The Mad Scientist
        • Oct 2003
        • 11892

        #4
        Better geometry. In an ideal situation, the sway bar needs to sit level when the car is sitting on the ground. Because the mount is on the control arm, there is very little distance between the control arm and the sway bar, making room for linkage non-existent. This gets worse as you lower the car more and more. By putting the mount above the sway bar on the strut tube, you have a lot more room to work with and can make the sway bar links whatever length you need to.

        Comment

        • nando
          Moderator
          • Nov 2003
          • 34827

          #5
          actually it's because the swaybar has more leverage over the strut than it does when you mount it to the arm. so a smaller bar is effectively stiffer.
          Build thread

          Bimmerlabs

          Comment

          • AndrewBird
            The Mad Scientist
            • Oct 2003
            • 11892

            #6
            I guess it would, wouldn't it? Further out on the arm means less leverage.

            Stiffer does not always equal better though. Stiffening only the front could result in unwanted understeer. There are way to many variables though to predict that based off of only mounting location.

            Comment

            • eLKuRLy
              Grease Monkey
              • Oct 2007
              • 360

              #7
              Forgot to add on 1st post an "upgrade" that did not involved adding sway link to strut; like them M3

              Comment

              • F34R
                sLaughter
                • May 2009
                • 12385

                #8
                Originally posted by nando
                An upgrade would be mounting it to the strut instead of the control arm.
                1+
                Originally posted by joncrz
                dont flame me for asking but... why is that?
                Here is my conversion:
                ~ Puch Cafe. ~ Do business? feedback ~ Check out my leather company ~

                Instagram: @BWeissLeather

                Current cars:
                ~ '87 325 M30B35 swap
                ~ '87 535
                ~ 01 540 Msport 6spd
                ~ '06 X5 4.8is

                Comment

                • nando
                  Moderator
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 34827

                  #9
                  Originally posted by eLKuRLy
                  Forgot to add on 1st post an "upgrade" that did not involved adding sway link to strut; like them M3
                  why do you think it's an upgrade? it's not going to make the swaybar any more effective.

                  being 5mm shorter or whatever that ends up being isn't going to do anything. you can't eliminate pre-load on the swaybar (or add it). That's the point of adjustable links.
                  Build thread

                  Bimmerlabs

                  Comment

                  • eLKuRLy
                    Grease Monkey
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 360

                    #10
                    Originally posted by nando
                    why do you think it's an upgrade? it's not going to make the swaybar any more effective.

                    being 5mm shorter or whatever that ends up being isn't going to do anything. you can't eliminate pre-load on the swaybar (or add it). That's the point of adjustable links.
                    I don't think it's an upgrade compared to the strut mount one. Asking if people have use other oem (non strut) type which is "better"/ "more durable" than what we have because I have seen people use other coilovers like BC, Megan, etc. and still use same control arm mount. I would love to modify to strut mount but it's a daily and not in the budget. Maybe in the future.

                    Comment

                    Working...