Dan, you are running 17's with the 60/40? Is your sig with the 60/40?
slammed look....
Collapse
X
-
-
what suspension are you running?Originally posted by egk2You probably want a 60/60 kit for the slammed look.Comment
-
in my sig im running 17"s with 245/40s but i have camber plates in front which raise the car a little, it tucks tire in back if you leave stock spring pads in, if you take them out even lower. i have mine in. front just closes the gap between the tire and fender perfectly. perfect drop in my opnion, its actually a little too low in my opnion for daily driving, in massachussetts at least. my skidplate has saved me many times.Dan

Comment
-
I was considering the 60/60 for the vert but I don't know if I want to go any lower than yours. Also I don't know if 17's will even fit under a vert with the 60/60Comment
-
-
Word, IE Stg 3's give a shitload of tuck in the rear on late (low) arch cars, and I am even with the rear fender on my early arch car. Front is still one or two finger gap away, but I don't really care, it handles really damn good :)Originally posted by egk2He has early arches. Mine don't even tuck.Comment
-
I think 60/60 is more like the motorboat look.Originally posted by egk2You probably want a 60/60 kit for the slammed look.
Comment
-
this doesnt look lower...
60/60

60/40

i guess its the rims size...but the 60/60 looks like there still a gap between the fender & tire/rimComment
-
Wouldn't rub on a vert with 17's? I see that you found on with 19's and it looks like a nice drop. The vert is just going to sit lower in the back making maybe a 60/50 instead of a 60/40, if I went with the 60/40. I don't know, just throw'n numbers out.Comment



Comment