what do u think?

[bpmack16]

http://boston.craigslist.org/nos/pts/1149039830.html

[Fidhle007]

Why bother?

[Adrian_Visser]

why not?

[Fidhle007]

M50 would be just as powerful and lighter for a similar price. Just my $0.02

[Adrian_Visser]

fair enough

[daniel]

M50 would be just as powerful and lighter for a similar price. Just my $0.02

yes, this. and more efficient.

[Liam]

I think they don't fit very well in e30s (but I also think this was coverd already).

[Fidhle007]

yes, this. and more efficient.

I think they don't fit very well in e30s (but I also think this was coverd already).

And those too. :-)

[pporcaro]

more torque. that's what makes cars fun

[Wh33lhop]

M50 would be just as powerful and lighter for a similar price. Just my $0.02

M30 would have an assload more torque and IMO sounds better.

But while we're at it, M50 is down on theoretical power by about 30hp... although the M30 will be older.

[e30s52]

M50 with a 4.10 lsd problem solved. M30's are old and like LIAM said they dont fit well.

[Wh33lhop]

M50 with a 4.10 lsd problem solved. M30's are old and like LIAM said they dont fit well.

How much is an M50 again?

[e30s52]

How much is an M50 again?

180 I think.

[Liam]

How much is an M50 again?

How much what?

Dollars, Kilos or inches too big for an e30 engine bay?

See here for specs:

http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=125810

[Danny]

Seriously, buy an M42.

Then buy my turbo kit.