Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rolls Royce 1- Mercedes Benz 0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Rolls Royce 1- Mercedes Benz 0

    Mercedes announced the death of Maybach on Friday after selling a dismal 3000 in nine years on market.



    FRANKFURT (Reuters) - Daimler (DAIGn.DE) will axe its Maybach superluxury brand after years of losses and moribund sales, replacing the car with more expensive models of its Mercedes-Benz S-Class flagship saloon starting in 2013.
    "We held extensive discussions internally about which way would promise the greatest success in the luxury segment, and we came to the conclusion that the sales chances for the Mercedes brand were better than that of Maybach," Chief Executive Dieter Zetsche told Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.
    "It would not be sensible to develop a successor model for the current Maybach," he added, according to an excerpt of the interview, which will be published in the German daily in full on Saturday.
    Instead, he plans to extend the number of S-Class derivatives from a current three to six in order to boost the model's volume, possibly even doubling it to 80,000 cars a year.
    A spokesman for the company declined to comment on which new S-Class derivatives would be added on top of the existing saloon, long-wheelbase saloon and the coupe, sold under the CL-Class nameplate.
    "Maybach sold cars upwards of 300,000 euros, but what we want to do now is move into the 100,000-300,000 euros segment -- where the annual volumes are in the thousands and not the hundreds," the spokesman said.
    BRITISH MARQUES TOO STRONG
    Originally aiming for volumes of 1,000 cars a year when launched in late 2002, Daimler has seen Maybach's annual sales slump to around 200 cars, where they held steady last year.
    Volkswagen (VOWG_p.DE) and BMW (BMWG.DE), by comparison, took far more successful excursions into the superluxury segment thanks to scooping up British marques Bentley and Rolls-Royce, respectively.
    Auto industry experts have long argued Maybach, a brand that before its revival in 2002 had not been in production since 1940, enjoyed no strong standing among the discriminating wealthy.
    BMW's Rolls-Royce, by contrast, has seen volumes soar 41 percent to 2,441 cars in the first nine months of this year, driven particularly by its lower price, higher volume Ghost model.
    VW's Bentley, best known for grand tourers like the Continental GT rather than large saloons, managed to increase its sales by 31 percent to 4,763 cars.
    The Maybach became such an image liability that Daimler stopped publishing monthly volume statistics several years ago, preferring only to present the figure in its annual accounts.
    A spokeswoman for BMW's Rolls-Royce declined to comment on the Maybach decision.
    (Reporting by Christiaan Hetzner; Editing by Will Waterman and Jane Merriman)
    Last edited by M-technik-3; 12-05-2011, 05:48 PM.
    https://www.facebook.com/BentOverRacing

    #2
    I mean, how many did they expect to sell? Its not a car for soccer moms or the everyday average Joe.

    It's market is very limited.

    Comment


      #3
      When compared to the rest of the cars in that class I have always thought Maybach was sort of... lackluster.

      Comment


        #4
        honestly, i think 330 a year is pretty good. that's nearly 1 a day for cars that cost what.. $350k-1mil?

        i also agree with danny.
        AWD > RWD

        Comment


          #5
          They expected to sell a thousand a year. As an invite only car they did shot themselves in the foot when they turned away Rap stars and other Thug style folks.
          https://www.facebook.com/BentOverRacing

          Comment


            #6
            expected result...from the way they structured the brand
            95 7.1L 16V E36 M3
            Motorsport Hardware ***Wheel studs and Spacers!!!--->FOR SALE 4/5 Lug Stud Conversion Kits available CLICK HERE
            LIKE my Facebook Page! CLICK HERE

            Comment


              #7
              I'm surprised they sold that many.

              I mean, who would REALLY want to buy a 350k+ dollar car from a company that is/was directly associated with chrysler?
              Last edited by TurboJake; 12-05-2011, 06:00 PM.


              Leave Me Transaction Feedback

              Comment


                #8
                Its based on the 20 year old W140, made to look like bloated version of the 10 year old W220 and conceived by the same managers that thought buying Chrysler was a good idea. Is anybody surprised?

                Comment


                  #9
                  They looked like shit.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Dammit, now what are rappers going to cut up? A Veyron? :(
                    Last edited by Raxe; 12-05-2011, 06:31 PM.

                    >> 1988 3.1 ITB E30 /// 2002 E46 M3 6MT / 2008 335xi 6MT / 1991 S38B36 E30 (sold)

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by TurboJake View Post
                      I'm surprised they sold that many.

                      I mean, who would REALLY want to buy a 350k+ dollar car from a company that is/was directly associated with chrysler?

                      It doens't have to do anything with Chrysler, that would be just plain dumb. It's like I'm not buying a Ferrari because either is asociated with Fiat cheap cars or, again, with Chrysler as we know.;)

                      In that luxury segment, there are other brands that "sound" more in that segment than Maybach, therefore people looking at the level of car, might pick other more known luxery car/brand.
                      Euro M3'87 NogaroSilver/Euro E34 M5 '93/Porsche 993 TT 97' Euro/Porsche 993 Carrera 95' Euro/Skyline R33 GT-R

                      Comment


                        #12
                        The S class got better reviews, costed way less, and seemed more updated.

                        The maybach was too subtle for it's price, anyone that "practical" looking for a car that expensive can turn to the Mercedes line which still comes with a lot of panache for less money.
                        Originally posted by z31maniac
                        I just hate everyone.

                        No need for discretion.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by diegom6 View Post
                          It doens't have to do anything with Chrysler, that would be just plain dumb. It's like I'm not buying a Ferrari because either is asociated with Fiat cheap cars or, again, with Chrysler as we know.;)
                          .
                          It does. At least to me.
                          It's not the price of cars. It's the quality of cars.

                          VW made quality cars, even cheap. People will buy a bugatti, porsche, Bentley, or Lamborghini.
                          Fiat made quality cars, even cheap.. People will buy a maserati or ferrari
                          BMW made quality cars. People will buy a Rolls Royce.

                          Chrysler group hasn't made quality cars since the 80's, and it's a very well known thing. Except to those who are hell bent on dodge/chrysler/plymouth vehicles. Like my parents...

                          Daimler signed up for this when they purchased them....

                          A parent group, and their level of quality on their subsidiaries goes a long ways in selling a vehicle to a person who does any amount of research. Those with a lot of money like to have the best. If I had a mediocre amount of money, I wouldn't even buy a merc that was made during the time that they've owned Chrysler. To me that would be shooting myself in the foot when something breaks down. I'd bitch about it every time.

                          Now Fiat owns Chrysler. So we'll see how that goes...
                          Last edited by TurboJake; 12-05-2011, 06:45 PM.


                          Leave Me Transaction Feedback

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by TurboJake View Post
                            It does. At least to me.
                            It's not the price of cars. It's the quality of cars.

                            VW made quality cars, even cheap. People will buy a bugatti, porsche, Bentley, or Lamborghini.
                            Fiat made quality cars, even cheap.. People will buy a maserati or ferrari
                            BMW made quality cars. People will buy a Rolls Royce.

                            Chrysler group hasn't made quality cars since the 80's, and it's a very well known thing. Except to those who are hell bent on dodge/chrysler/plymouth vehicles. Like my parents...

                            Daimler signed up for this when they purchased them....

                            A parent group, and their level of quality on their subsidiaries goes a long ways in selling a vehicle to a person who does any amount of research. Those with a lot of money like to have the best. If I had a mediocre amount of money, I wouldn't even buy a merc that was made during the time that they've owned Chrysler. To me that would be shooting myself in the foot when something breaks down. I'd bitch about it every time.

                            Now Fiat owns Chrysler. So we'll see how that goes...
                            Haha you left out MINI under BMW, but that makes sense as the new MINI is awful.



                            Awfully cool. <3

                            >> 1988 3.1 ITB E30 /// 2002 E46 M3 6MT / 2008 335xi 6MT / 1991 S38B36 E30 (sold)

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by TurboJake View Post
                              It does. At least to me.
                              It's not the price of cars. It's the quality of cars.

                              VW made quality cars, even cheap. People will buy a bugatti, porsche, Bentley, or Lamborghini.
                              Fiat made quality cars, even cheap.. People will buy a maserati or ferrari
                              BMW made quality cars. People will buy a Rolls Royce.

                              Chrysler group hasn't made quality cars since the 80's, and it's a very well known thing. Except to those who are hell bent on dodge/chrysler/plymouth vehicles. Like my parents...

                              Daimler signed up for this when they purchased them....

                              A parent group, and their level of quality on their subsidiaries goes a long ways in selling a vehicle to a person who does any amount of research. Those with a lot of money like to have the best. If I had a mediocre amount of money, I wouldn't even buy a merc that was made during the time that they've owned Chrysler. To me that would be shooting myself in the foot when something breaks down. I'd bitch about it every time.

                              Now Fiat owns Chrysler. So we'll see how that goes...
                              Mercedes sold off Chrysler 5 years ago and you're still bitching about it?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X