The e36 **eyecandy** thread
Collapse
X
-

Originally posted by SpasticDwarf;n6449866Honestly I built it just to have a place to sit and listen to Hotline Bling on repeat.Comment
-
question: is the e36 worse in the snow than the e30? i always thought my e30 (325i) was competent in the snow, but the same can't be said for my e36 (m3). is it the interference of the ASC? traction does seem marginally improved with ASC off, then again it's hard to tell. plus i don't want to pretend i'm a hero and turn off ASC only to potentially have it bite me in the ass. after all, these things exist for a reason... right?
both cars have (had) good snow tires on them, so that factor can be ruled out.
(i know this is the eyecandy thread, but figure if e36 owners are hanging out anywhere on r3v, it's here.)
E46tComment
-
~ Puch Cafe. ~ Do business? feedback ~ Check out my leather company ~
Instagram: @BWeissLeather
Current cars:
~ '87 325 M30B35 swap
~ '87 535
~ 01 540 Msport 6spd
~ '06 X5 4.8isComment
-
My biggest problem with the e36 is the rear wheel arch........it's to freaking low.sigpic
Rebellion Forge Custom Fabrication
1988 325is - TrackRat in progress
Instagram @rebellionforgeComment
-
you're right, the asc is the issue. early models don't have it, so as long as you drive like you do in your e30, there shouldn't be any issues. my 95 was never equipped with it and i have learned how to control it by the throttle.question: is the e36 worse in the snow than the e30? i always thought my e30 (325i) was competent in the snow, but the same can't be said for my e36 (m3). is it the interference of the ASC? traction does seem marginally improved with ASC off, then again it's hard to tell. plus i don't want to pretend i'm a hero and turn off ASC only to potentially have it bite me in the ass. after all, these things exist for a reason... right?
both cars have (had) good snow tires on them, so that factor can be ruled out.
(i know this is the eyecandy thread, but figure if e36 owners are hanging out anywhere on r3v, it's here.)
completely agree. it went to total shit when he decided to put oversize wheels and then compensated with retarded camber and rubber band tires.
「'89 BMW 325is | '02 Mitsubishi Montero Limited | '2005 GMC Sierra 2500 Duramax | 2007 BMW M5 」
「my feedback thread」Comment
-
This fad is getting annoying, Big wheels, Low car, Rubber bands... A formula that needs to die. IMO Its dangerous and retarded, and is similar in looks to baggy pants hoodlums.
1989 BMW 325is | 2019 Ford Ranger FX4
willschnitzComment
-
My E36 M3 is a beast in snow despite stiff coilovers, track pads, and low clearance. Not as good as my subaru, but when both have snow tires the M is quite usable. In your case, ASC is not helping, but go get 2-4 75lb sandbags and put them right over the rear axle. Helps immensely (worked on the E30 too). You have the tires, just need a little more rear weight. If your tires are more than a couple seasons old though, it's time for new ones. They age out well before they wear out.question: is the e36 worse in the snow than the e30? i always thought my e30 (325i) was competent in the snow, but the same can't be said for my e36 (m3). is it the interference of the ASC? traction does seem marginally improved with ASC off, then again it's hard to tell. plus i don't want to pretend i'm a hero and turn off ASC only to potentially have it bite me in the ass. after all, these things exist for a reason... right?
both cars have (had) good snow tires on them, so that factor can be ruled out.
(i know this is the eyecandy thread, but figure if e36 owners are hanging out anywhere on r3v, it's here.)Comment
-

「'89 BMW 325is | '02 Mitsubishi Montero Limited | '2005 GMC Sierra 2500 Duramax | 2007 BMW M5 」
「my feedback thread」Comment
-
sigpic
Rebellion Forge Custom Fabrication
1988 325is - TrackRat in progress
Instagram @rebellionforgeComment





Comment