675 HP civic si?

[MitchFong]

is this fucking possible?

http://www.hondahookup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=106517

[MitchFong]

heres the dyno.

[nando]

nice peak #s but that is a shitty ass torque curve. I bet he has serious traction issues too..

[thejimlab]

lol 8500 rpm

[jon volk]

Sure, entirely possible....the torque/hp curve is about the equivilent of most 800+hp supras powerband wise....actually that has a larger power curve than some Ive seen. Hell there is a guy that goes by the name pacman that is building a 1000hp K-series motor right now. Done right Hondas can make some great power.....not cheap but by all means possible.

[uofom3]

area under the curve = shit

great peak power though.. driveability is likely shit

[SlowE30]

that dyno graph is SOOO fake... The lines have to cross at 5252, but they dont cross there. Although I do believe that car has that much hp, but thats not a real graph.

[jon volk]

probably a dyna-pack. You have to physically tell the software to force scaling otherwise it defaults to diff. hp and tq scales....look at the scales on each side. If the TQ scale went to 700 as well the graph would cross at 5250. Dyna-packs are gay.

[CleanAzzE30z]

driveability is likely shit

thats the understatement of the new year.

[motorprestige]

thats the understatement of the new year.

why? It's not going to be used much below 6,000 rpm anyway. I'm sure this persons idea of drivable is power understeer, shit gas mileage, insane loss of traction...etc, in wich it fits perfectly.;)

[SlowE30]

probably a dyna-pack. You have to physically tell the software to force scaling otherwise it defaults to diff. hp and tq scales....look at the scales on each side. If the TQ scale went to 700 as well the graph would cross at 5250. Dyna-packs are gay.

that has nothing to do with it. HP numbers are determined through a mathematical equation. (tq*rpm)/5252=hp. Its just like that. Someone made that graph on their computer or something cause its fake.

[SlowE30]

Cause if the tq numbers are correct then the hp would be at 728.

[jon volk]

Cause if the tq numbers are correct then the hp would be at 728.

Yeah, too bad peak torque isnt at 8500RPM. Torque at 8500 is 400ft/lbs which come out to GASP 647hp

Max torque is approx 6200 which comes out to 531...hmmm strangley matches up with the graph.

Both of them cross 5250 at approx 230 ft/lbs and HP respectively...cant get an exact number, just eyeballing....

so yes, if the dyno operater chose to force scaling as I said before the chart was printed/made it would look normal.

[Ryan Stewart]

Locally there is one that puts down mid 5s. he prefers to run from a roll (obviously) but it doesnt much matter. I can beat him to 60 but then he blows by me like I was actually driving an Eta.

[CleanAzzE30z]

I can beat him to 60 but then he blows by me like I was actually driving an Eta.

tsk tsk. All this non-eta-love. :)