If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
-1986 S50Turbo Sedan (475WHP/417WTQ) Castromotorsport Built (Sold)
-1987 Coupe (17x10.5"/17x14")
Castromotorsport / Buddha_Concept_designs Built *UnderConstruction*
Because you can accelerate faster? Isn't that the whole point of almost ever performance mod? If you don't go on the highway much, might as well get a 4.10. It'll be better in the city.
Disregard this guy. He isWrong.
As a 4.10 user for 2 years, going to a 3.73 LSD was the best decision I made in terms of economy and daily driveage.
Tell me why I'm wrong. It's a personal opinion, you can't really be wrong. First of all, a 4.10 will flat out accelerate faster than a 3.73, are you going to argue that? That's the only thing I said that I could possibly be "wrong" on because it's the only fact that I stated. Secondly, he's mainly driving in the city, san francisco (hello hills), which means lots of shifts whether he has a 4.10 or a 3.73. Faster acceleration off the line and at lower speeds is better for city driving.
By all means, a 3.73 is by far the best compromise for an m20b25 and has the best overall gearing for a combination of city and highway driving. But for mainly surface roads, I would personally go with the shorter diff. Sorry for going off on a bit of a rant, but just because you disagree with someone doesn't mean they're wrong.
The first car I ever rode in was an e30
Originally posted by Cabriolet
Wish you the best and hope you don't remember anything after 10pm.
1992 Mauritiusblau Vert
2011 Alpinweiss 335is coupe
Tell me why I'm wrong. It's a personal opinion, you can't really be wrong. First of all, a 4.10 will flat out accelerate faster than a 3.73, are you going to argue that? That's the only thing I said that I could possibly be "wrong" on because it's the only fact that I stated. Secondly, he's mainly driving in the city, san francisco (hello hills), which means lots of shifts whether he has a 4.10 or a 3.73. Faster acceleration off the line and at lower speeds is better for city driving.
By all means, a 3.73 is by far the best compromise for an m20b25 and has the best overall gearing for a combination of city and highway driving. But for mainly surface roads, I would personally go with the shorter diff. Sorry for going off on a bit of a rant, but just because you disagree with someone doesn't mean they're wrong.
I can guarantee even in the city the 4.10 will get worse gas mileage than the 3.73. I have what's called "personal experience". The 4.10 is fun but it gets pretty ridiculous in traffic. I used to just start in 2nd during rush hour. Even with the hills he's better off with the 3.73 & he wont have to worry about getting 20mpg on the freeway.
The acceleration between the 4.10 & the 3.73 is almost negligible. 4.10 feels torquier, but actually faster? Meh. Barely.
With that in mind, if I didn't daily my e30 I would have a 4.10 LSD in it.
I live in San Francisco so not a lot of highway driving but I also don't want to burn a hole in my pocket if I decided to take the beast up to Sonoma for some wine tasting.
It's like 100 miles, round trip. +/- half a gallon of fuel difference.
What is the height of your tires from the ground, in inches?
I've tried them all.
I do a lot of highway driving in my 92 318ic vert. I swapped it to an m20 and put a 3.73 in and it sucked. it didn't really suck, it was the perfect ratio actually but then I bought an e39 for cruising the hwy. The e30 felt sluggish now. I put the 4.10 in and liked it, I then put the factory 4.27 back in and loved it. It's short but great for stop and go!
You can start from 2nd gear with plenty of pulling power and then jump to 4th or 5th if you don't like dicking around with the shifter in city traffic.
oh and so far I'm back at square one. Equal number of people have suggested 3.73 vs. 4.10 I guess I just have to see which LSD ratio I can find available locally first :)
-----------------------------------
Life is too short to be driving a Honda.
There are a lot of creative opinions in this thread. There are two things that affect rpm and torque output given a fixed (stock) engine /transmission combo: Tire diameter and rear end ratio. Lets ignore tire diameter for now.
The final drive ratio is absolutely personal preference, however those who are saying the 4.10 is not quicker than a 3.73 have their head up their ass.
The rear gear is a multiplier. The higher the number, the more torque is put to the ground for a given gear. There is no opinion about this, it is a mathematical fact. Your car will be faster in every single gear with a 4.10 vs 3.73.
One aspect a lot of people overlook is a product of this multiplication. With a numerically higher rear end the entire gear range gets compressed, all the gears get shorter and closer together. You end up shifting more in addition to having a higher rpm at cruising speed. It feels more like a close ratio sprinter.
With a lower numerically rear gear the gear range spreads out and there a larger gap between the gears. The car feels longer legged as it were.
OP, you are going to have figure it out yourself, it is too much a personal preference. If i rarely drove on the highway i would run a 4.10 since the M20 does not have a ton of torque.
If i was running unusually tall or short tires my answer might be different.
Comment