Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

*official Calender Submission* FINAL!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Antrieb
    i knew you'd say that
    You also need to take an INT3RW3B class to learn how to quote the above 10 messages that are slamming you. This will make it easier for future slamming. Thanks.

    Comment


      Originally posted by grapedrink
      I guess they wan't to see every pixel and get their moneys worth.???

      RISING EDGE

      Let's drive fast and have fun.

      Comment


        Originally posted by rwh11385
        hey n00b (calendar fag), you should be informed that shitbox racing is a trademarked name used by Will, Charlie, Dave, Rob, and myself.... just in case you liked the ring of it
        If you use it without permission, some junkyard dog lawyer will be all over your ass . . .
        Current Cars
        2014 M235i
        2009 R56 Cooper S
        1998 M3
        1997 M3

        Comment


          Originally posted by Jordan
          1600x1200 is pretty sharp at a full 8.5x11 print TJ.
          You should know better than to question TJ, Jordan. He is a professional.

          ;)

          Comment


            Originally posted by rwh11385
            tape. it is sometime usually mandated for glass on the track because we go over 110+ mph and kick up rocks and rubber "marbles" from tires and don't want the glass debris of the headlights on the track surface if they break
            Can Eta's run +110mph ??? even it's not on an airfield landing strip ??
            I'm just curious If that white Eta can still reach 115mph

            1989 E30 318iS_______________________________1989 E30 325iC M-Technic I
            1997 E36 328iT
            1990 E30 325iT 24v SOLD
            1989 E30 325i 2.7i M-Technic II SOLD

            Comment


              Originally posted by Jordan
              1600x1200 is pretty sharp at a full 8.5x11 print TJ.
              Jordan, "sharp" is a purely relative term. Canon 1DSMkII owners (I have one of those, too, just so we can establish that I'm not biased) think their lenses are sharp...but they ain't shit compared to our Carl Zeiss Contax lenses.

              It all depends on what you've seen before.

              Comment


                Originally posted by trent
                You also need to take an INT3RW3B class to learn how to quote the above 10 messages that are slamming you. This will make it easier for future slamming. Thanks.

                Trent did I do it right?


                Originally posted by DaveCN
                Welcome.

                Your car is a piece of shit.

                Most of them here are, too.

                Comment


                  FYI, this is a good example of "Carl Zeiss Sharp":

                  Originally posted by Ben Carufel
                  OK, so 56k won't have trouble reading this...but it'll take them forever to download this image.

                  This is a shot I took of a buddies' Lotus Elise last March the day after our 22 megapixel digital back arrived.

                  Info:

                  Contax 645 Body w/ Phase One P25 Digital Back
                  Contax Zeiss 45-90mm f/4.5
                  No Filters

                  Shutter Speed: 1/1000th
                  Aperture: f/4.5
                  Focal Length: 90mm
                  ISO: 100

                  5440x4080 Pixels @ 300dpi
                  18.133x13.6 Inches @ 300dpi
                  Resized to 8-Bit (Native Raw Capture Is 16-Bit)
                  63.54 Megabyte .TIFF File

                  Take it into Photoshop, go to 100%, and have fun reading the DOT text in the headlight lenses :).

                  Right Click, Save As:

                  http://www.chartersventures.com/car/.../neillotus.tif [70.0mb!]

                  Smaller crops so you don't have to download the whole big one:

                  http://www.chartersventures.com/car/...lotuscrop1.tif [2.4mb]

                  http://www.chartersventures.com/car/...lotuscrop2.tif [1.5mb]

                  http://www.chartersventures.com/car/...lotuscrop3.tif [650kb]

                  http://www.chartersventures.com/car/...otusresize.tif [1.5mb]

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by BavarianBimmer
                    Can Eta's run +110mph ??? even it's not on an airfield landing strip ??
                    I'm just curious If that white Eta can still reach 115mph

                    Down 10% grade hill with a 50mph tail wind.

                    Originally posted by DaveCN
                    Welcome.

                    Your car is a piece of shit.

                    Most of them here are, too.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Ben Carufel
                      Jordan, "sharp" is a purely relative term. Canon 1DSMkII owners (I have one of those, too, just so we can establish that I'm not biased) think their lenses are sharp...but they ain't shit compared to our Carl Zeiss Contax lenses.

                      It all depends on what you've seen before.
                      Given a 1600x1200 JPEG that most point and shoots are capable of, what do you think is the limit for a high quality print? Were you laughing with me, or at me?

                      RISING EDGE

                      Let's drive fast and have fun.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Digitalwave
                        Given a 1600x1200 JPEG that most point and shoots are capable of, what do you think is the limit for a high quality print? Were you laughing with me, or at me?
                        I was laughing with you.

                        Your question depends on DPI and bit depth.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Ben Carufel
                          Jordan, "sharp" is a purely relative term. Canon 1DSMkII owners (I have one of those, too, just so we can establish that I'm not biased) think their lenses are sharp...but they ain't shit compared to our Carl Zeiss Contax lenses.

                          It all depends on what you've seen before.

                          Good point. I can say that MY CAMERA makes very sharp 8.5x11 prints @ 1600x1200.


                          E30 ABS Pump Refurbishment Service
                          https://mtechniqueauto.com/

                          Comment


                            dunno about 115 but i've done 105. any car can make it up there it just takes time. you could get your moms van to do 115 if you had a long enough strip and the right gearing

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Jordan
                              Good point. I can say that MY CAMERA makes very sharp 8.5x11 prints @ 1600x1200.
                              What you mean is that in YOUR OPINION, your camera makes very sharp 8.5x11 prints @ 1600x1200.

                              If you saw an 8.5x11 from one of my cameras, you would re-evaluate your definition of "sharp".

                              Thus making "sharp" a relative term.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Antrieb
                                dunno about 115 but i've done 105. any car can make it up there it just takes time. you could get your moms van to do 115 if you had a long enough strip and the right gearing
                                I had your mom up to 115, she was sweating pretty hard.

                                Oh yea, I went there.

                                -Charlie
                                Swing wild, brake later, don't apologize.
                                '89 324d, '76 02, '98 318ti, '03 Z4, '07 MCS, '07 F800s - Bonafide BMW elitist prick.
                                FYYFF

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X