but the S52 is so much fun in the E30 M3
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
E30 BMW M3: Most Overhyped Classic? - AFTER/DRIVE
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by pwagon717 View Postbut the S52 is so much fun in the E30...(does it have to be an M3?)Last edited by reelizmpro; 05-10-2013, 04:20 PM."I'd probably take the E30 M3 in this case just because I love that little car, and how tanky that inline 6 is." - thecj
85 323i M TECH 1 S52 - ALPINEWEISS/SCHWARZE
88 M3 - LACHSSILBER/SCHWARZE
89 M3 - ALPINEWEISS II/M TECH CLOTH-ALCANTARA
91 M TECHNIC CABRIO TURBO - MACAOBLAU/M TECH CLOTH-LEATHER
Comment
-
Originally posted by carfantiti View Post^ you have to understand something magical ,mythical ,amazing about a car that does not have to be huge HP to just make you love it!!!!I love fast cars ,I love the never ending need for speed.the e30 m3 satisfies me in a way no other car has even if the other car had 500hp!This might be one the most special things about this car.Just all put together in one little package.The high revving beautiful sounding s14 .the feel when you drive it.Funny you are hauling ass in this car at the stop light .It is a little taste of what the race car drivers must feel every day I step in the drivers seat.it is just true love for me I plan to be cremated and put in the gas tank:)
But yeah, I guess that is why I was saying I am really not a true e30 m3 enthusiast. If money wasn't an issue, I'd have one and drive the hell out of it. It would have a place in my life for sure. But for what they are going for these days I would personally be just as happy with a modded m20 325i. My biggest mistake, was when i bought my current car instead of holding off for another 6 months to a year and picking up an M3 back when the 15K rule still applied. I have spent as much on my current e30 as M3's are going for now.
Originally posted by Herr Faust Schinken View PostWhat's wrong with youngsters? Its not like all of us go around slamming our cars to the ground, a lot of us have tons of blood sweat and tears into our cars and trying to make them nice, I don't think any of us younger guys love our e30s anymore or less than older members do, I am a bit happy that prices have gone up in my area though even if it is for purely selfish reasonsE30 Dinan Turbo
Comment
-
Originally posted by bimma360 View Post
Nothing wrong with you guys. I was generalizing, and as you mentioned not every youngster is the same. I don't really consider myself part of the older crowd either as I am 29. But I've been in the e30 game since I was 16 or 17, and have watched it evolve into what it is to day. Not even saying what it is today is necessarily bad. I think its cool how people go about expressing themselves with their e30, and for the most part I try not to judge. I am just looking forward to the e30 maturing a bit. And that WILL happen as they get more expensive. Then again I have this romanticism about the e30 a lot in the same way much older guys have with cars from the '60s. And I may be crazy for that, so what do I really know haha.88 325is Five SpeedLachssilber
Comment
-
Originally posted by JRKOUPE View PostWill ..
your comment made me think ...post 74..thats a significant era of bad cars, post 74...
but here are a few..
MB 500E..built by both MB and Porsche
e28 and e34 M5....
some 911 variants...78-98 to start...sc, carrera, 964, and 993....
anyhew.....I never have fallen in love w/ the e30M3......Ive only driven 1..and it was very rough. But they do always seems to leave me on a track...lol
I would like an E28 M5, the E34 does nothing for me. Yes, I'd be interested in a 2.7 RS or RSR (yeah right hahahaha). I could have bought a 930 Porsche, but I went for the M3 and don't regret it for a minute. Honestly its about the closest thing to driving my Datsun from a driving standpoint. The M3 isn't nearly as raw (for me its downright plush) but the feel is close. I can't say I've driven a standard E30 much, and certainly not a tuned one (I know a guy who has a very well sorted one who just wipes the floor with me, but he is also on Hoosier R compounds, and Im on RS3s. On R compounds my M3 should be able to close the gap pretty easily.) The major difference between the roadster and the M3 is that the M3 is SO much easier to drive at the limit, not to mention doing a 300 mile drive.
After putting close to 25K miles on my M3 since December 2011, I wouldn't change a thing on the car. Sure, 15 more hp would be great but its not needed. It does everything I ask it to without hesitation. Sure, stop and go sucks, but stop and go traffic in any manual transmission car sucks. Freeway cruising is nothing to write home about, but there shouldn't be anything to get excited about. Freeways are highspeed usually straight, and boring. Backroad highway driving, hell yes. I guess the only real things I can complane about are the power windows (would rather save weight and go with manual ones any day of the week) and the sunroof (although I have it cracked nearly all the time. I'd still rather have less weight up high, and the better rigidity of a solid roof.) The A/C I can take or leave, currently mine doesn't work, and I haven't bothered to figure out why (its not worth the effort) The cockpit layout is hard to beat, the visibility out of the car is excelent, and it totally lacks any frivolous fluff (the part I like the most). The car has no distractions, so my attention is always on driving the car and nothing else. (The way it should be.)
I could have bought a lot of different cars when I bought the M3, but only the M3 really captured my imagination (just like it did the first time I saw one in 1988. When I first saw one as a kid, I was mesmorized by it. I wanted one back then, and 25 years later I got my chance.) Heck, everytime I'd go to the Monterey Historics, I'd spend most of the morning looking at all the M3s in the corrals, and I'd take a pic of each and every one. It took loosing a pretty special car to get mine, but I think I have to admit, I enjoy driving the M3 more than I enjoyed driving my '69 Alfa GTV. (I'd still love to have the GTV back.)
Will'59 Alfa Romeo 101.02 Giulietta Sprint
'69 Alfa Romeo 105.51 1750 GTV (R.I.P)
'69 Datsun 2000 roadster Vintage race car
'88 BMW M3
Comment
-
Wish i had one..... :(
Sent from my LG-MS870 using Tapatalk 2sigpicMy Project!
Official North Texas Bimmers Club E30 Representative
www.BimmerAlliance.net
"If you have questions about events or need help in the DFW area don't be afraid to contact me."
Comment
-
Originally posted by pandaboo911 View PostThe guy said the m3 is more "balanced" than the standard 325. I hope he wasn't comparing it to a stock 325 because that is totally inaccurate. The suspension is fucking identical, minus the front sway bar mount. The only difference is the spring rates.
I don't see anything wrong with replacing the s14, it's expensive and slow
Also they seem like total hipsters, and I quote, hipsters ruin everything.
/rant
Some people identify an M3 by the box flares. I identify an M3 by its heart.1985 M10b18. 70maybewhpoffury. Over engineered S50b30 murica BBQ swap in progress.
Originally posted by DEV0 E30You'd chugg this butt. I know you would. Ain't gotta' lie to kick it brostantinople.
Comment
-
To touch on that a bit...the m3 is known for its engine. They could have put in a 2.7 liter I engine and been finished but created the s14 instead. It was the best thing they could have done for the car from a racing perspective. The m3 was a balanced package, just the right amount of everything and the engine of course is a big part of the equation. Some feel, it was the most significant.
If u take a 84 325e s50 and 88 m3 s50...will they not drive the same? Provided the suspension is more or less the same? Of course, so why take the m3 and ruin a classic car known for its engine? Because its an m3 and looks cool?"I'd probably take the E30 M3 in this case just because I love that little car, and how tanky that inline 6 is." - thecj
85 323i M TECH 1 S52 - ALPINEWEISS/SCHWARZE
88 M3 - LACHSSILBER/SCHWARZE
89 M3 - ALPINEWEISS II/M TECH CLOTH-ALCANTARA
91 M TECHNIC CABRIO TURBO - MACAOBLAU/M TECH CLOTH-LEATHER
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlackbirdM3 View PostWhat I find most interesting is the fact that of the big 3 front runners in DTM,WTCC ect from back in the day the M3 is the most valuable even though it was the middle priced car (between the 190 Cosworth, and the Ford Sierra Cosworth) The 190 was what, $80K new? Now you find them for $10-15K if not less. The Sierra is pretty rare and obscure here in the US (unless you call it a Merkur XR4Ti) so I'm not even going to consider it. Even so, an XR4Ti can be found racing 24 hrs of Lemons.
Yes, an E30 M3 is not cheap to keep on the road, but no limited production performance car is.
Will
Sent from a rotary-dial phone using Edna the Small Town Operatorsigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevinl View Post
I also agree with not ripping out the s14 unless its to put in a S38
M30,, M88 etc etc,, thats why ,,
the M/S 5x series of engines are very good.. but for me i like the older engines a lot better
I am not saying they are better....
ALPINA molded in a M30B35 at 261 hp in to the E30 M3 body and outperformed the E30 M3 ,,as stock,,,,, in i think most every possble way you can imagine ,, even on Nürburgring Nordschleife it totally outgunned it ((even to my big surprice,, i always thought the opposite))
The bigblock IL 6 is longer ,,,yes but a 3.6 or 3.8 24v semi race IL6 is a hell of a engine in to the E30 body,,,,,,, and suits the character from this decadeSveinbjörn Hrafnsson
E30 CABRIO V12 M70B50 ///
ALPINA B10 BITURBO 346 @ 507
E34 550 V12 JML
Finnish wisdom : If you want to Win,, hire a Finn
http://alpina.123.is/pictures/
Comment
-
An M3 w/ an s38 is preferred over an m/s5x but still not true to the car's original character. by all means, do what you want to your own car, I don't even own one.. of course a factory original Alpina E30 M3 body w/ s38 is completely amazing, but jmo the BMW-produced E30 M3 should be powered by an S14. If you want more power the ideal solution is a 2.5 liter refresh.
Comment
-
I wouldnt take out the s14. I would rebuild it with a 2.7 bottom end. Mmmmm.
I am on the fence about owning one. I'm not awestruck by them, and having driven many prepared e30s with swaps, I cant say that I am missing much other than the sentimentalism.
I do see and agree with the price increases. BMWs were much more timeless in that era. You get into a 190, and then an e30; the e30 feels and looks newer.
I will always have an e30, but I may add an m3 as an addition, not a replacement.sigpic
Comment
-
M3 was made to be a race car, so the stock engine isn't really a very good DD engine...It makes me laugh at people that get their panties in a bunch over an engine swap....it's their car, they do whatever they want to it anyway. It's not like they are cutting the e30m3 shell and making it into a pos-drift-truck.Mtech1 v8 build thread - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho...d.php?t=413205
OEM v8 manual chip or dme - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho....php?p=4938827
Comment
Comment