Im definitely around 3600+ at interstate speeds. The mpg's suck in the ix as well. But driving an ix in the dirt/snow is an absolute blast. I was considering selling mine but god dammit that thing grips! But hell, even my 91 318is was a tank in the snow. My snowboard barely fit in the backseat but it had no problem climbing the mountain.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
325iX: Desirable?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MF DOOM View PostIm definitely around 3600+ at interstate speeds. The mpg's suck in the ix as well. But driving an ix in the dirt/snow is an absolute blast. I was considering selling mine but god dammit that thing grips! But hell, even my 91 318is was a tank in the snow. My snowboard barely fit in the backseat but it had no problem climbing the mountain.
Comment
-
Originally posted by goarmy View Post^^^ would larger wheels reduced the rpm? I see more and more cars coming out with larger wheels..
1992 M tech 2 Convertible - S50 Swap
1992 e34 Touring- S50 Swap
1992 325i-S50 Swap (SOLD)
1995 e36 M3 Mugello Red - S50 (SOLD)
1991 325i Convertible Laguna Green (SOLD)
1987 325i (SOLD);1992 M tech 2 Convertible (SOLD)
1988 325i Convertible Alpine White (SOLD)
1991 Brilliantrot Convertible 80k Miles (SOLD)
1992 325i Convertible Schwarz (SOLD)
1992 318i Convertible Project-Finished (SOLD)
Comment
-
Originally posted by nando View PostThen you're going 90mph. I have 4.10s, 3500 is 75mph. Not 7600 at 70 with 3.91s.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KIRIEIW View PostYes, It will also give an inaccurate speed reading.
it also increases rolling resistance, road noise, fuel consumption and the risk of damaging the wheels
BUT IT LOOKS SOOOOOO COOOLL THO!If it's got tits or tires, it's gonna cost ya!
Comment
Comment