Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wow look out, Don't mess with a Caddy CTS-V

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Yup, sounds like xenons.

    Comment


      #17
      the 4th generation Voyager hasn't Xenon's :?
      H7 Halogen bulbs (euro cars)

      1989 E30 318iS_______________________________1989 E30 325iC M-Technic I
      1997 E36 328iT
      1990 E30 325iT 24v SOLD
      1989 E30 325i 2.7i M-Technic II SOLD

      Comment


        #18
        I have never seen a Cadillac that appeals to me. The above being no exception.

        Comment


          #19
          I read an article in car and driver, where they compared the cts-v , m5 and an m3???, lol.
          "The cadillac trailed the m5 in every acceleration category, and its 13.7 second elapsed time through the quarter was the slowest of the trio."

          They also had a problem with the oil temperature, or instrumentation, the gauge was reading excessive oil temps, so they didn't beat the car too hard.

          The testers also had difficulty launching the cts-v and weren't able to reproduce GMs 4.5 sec 0-60 times, with a best of 5.2.

          I would still prefer the m5, but that is the best cadillac I've seen to date.

          Comment


            #20
            Nice headlight sticker.

            I bombed Korea every night.

            Comment


              #21
              Wow, this car and the Ford GT makes me proud I am an american :-)
              Any news on if the Ford GT gonna race either this year or next?

              NASA MidSouth TT Director / GTS2 #018
              Mods: Coastal PS Fluid, 10w40 Oil
              Future Mods: Bosch Micro-Edge Wiper Blades, Painter's Tape, Spark Plugs, Freezer for Nutty Buddys, Adam Nitti CD's

              Comment


                #22
                uuummmm....GT.

                :bow:

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by DaN
                  I read an article in car and driver, where they compared the cts-v , m5 and an m3???, lol.
                  "The cadillac trailed the m5 in every acceleration category, and its 13.7 second elapsed time through the quarter was the slowest of the trio."

                  They also had a problem with the oil temperature, or instrumentation, the gauge was reading excessive oil temps, so they didn't beat the car too hard.

                  The testers also had difficulty launching the cts-v and weren't able to reproduce GMs 4.5 sec 0-60 times, with a best of 5.2.

                  I would still prefer the m5, but that is the best cadillac I've seen to date.
                  I think the reason for this would stem from the pansey tire they put on it. 245-45-18 are way to skinny with that much HP and TQ levels. The car smoked'em thru 2 gears on Motor Week show, and they don't dog the cars either. This car is pointing the way for US automanufacters to try and gain some respect they have lost over the years. More power to them but don't forget about their bread and butter like Ford has done with killing off the Focus.
                  https://www.facebook.com/BentOverRacing

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by BavarianBimmer
                    yeah right

                    like chrysler said to his salesmen : the new Voyager (4) has 200% more light than the previous generation .
                    so I think that previous model hasn't headlights :D
                    In that case, it still wouldn't have headlights. 200% more than nothing is what?

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by Mystikal
                      Originally posted by BavarianBimmer
                      yeah right

                      like chrysler said to his salesmen : the new Voyager (4) has 200% more light than the previous generation .
                      so I think that previous model hasn't headlights :D
                      In that case, it still wouldn't have headlights. 200% more than nothing is what?
                      oops :oops: math wasn't my strongest side on college

                      1989 E30 318iS_______________________________1989 E30 325iC M-Technic I
                      1997 E36 328iT
                      1990 E30 325iT 24v SOLD
                      1989 E30 325i 2.7i M-Technic II SOLD

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X