Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No Proper Size Tires?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    No Proper Size Tires?

    It seems there is no proper sized tire for a 16x8 and 16x9 setup or 16x8.5 and 16x9.5. You cannot get a matching diameter.

    For instance, you can find a 205/45/16 (23.3" diameter), but no matching 235/40/16 (23.4" diameter)

    Is this why everyone stretches the hell out of their tires?

    Mr. Wolfe
    sigpic

    #2
    no its not why.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by rcsoundn1 View Post
      no its not why.
      Go on.

      Mr. Wolfe
      sigpic

      Comment


        #4
        People stretch it because of the poke and stretch revolution........?? not into that myself but whatever. Choices in 16" have been getting slim for the last few years. Even the most basic ford focus or Toyota corolla now comes from the factory with 17" wheels.
        FEEDBACK:
        http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=316212

        BMWCCA #398608
        IG @yagayo38

        "The Best E30's were built with two camshafts four cylinders and sixteen valves!".

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Mr. Wolfe View Post
          It seems there is no proper sized tire for a 16x8 and 16x9 setup or 16x8.5 and 16x9.5. You cannot get a matching diameter.

          For instance, you can find a 205/45/16 (23.3" diameter), but no matching 235/40/16 (23.4" diameter)

          Is this why everyone stretches the hell out of their tires?

          Mr. Wolfe
          I ran into this same dilemma with my 16x8 and 16x9 setup. I ended up just doing a 215/45/16 on the front and backs. The fronts look good but the rears are stretched a bit. When you looked at different sizes, you couldn't get the same tires or even close to the same tread rating.
          1989 325i S50 swapped
          2007 4Runner Sport V8

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by getouth View Post
            People stretch it because of the poke and stretch revolution........?? not into that myself but whatever. Choices in 16" have been getting slim for the last few years. Even the most basic ford focus or Toyota corolla now comes from the factory with 17" wheels.
            That seems to be the case. I even thought about going 17", but I think they look a tad big on the e30.

            Originally posted by bumada View Post
            I ran into this same dilemma with my 16x8 and 16x9 setup. I ended up just doing a 215/45/16 on the front and backs. The fronts look good but the rears are stretched a bit. When you looked at different sizes, you couldn't get the same tires or even close to the same tread rating.
            That is what I am finding. Do you happen to have any pictures of your setup?

            Mr. Wolfe
            sigpic

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Mr. Wolfe View Post
              That seems to be the case. I even thought about going 17", but I think they look a tad big on the e30.



              That is what I am finding. Do you happen to have any pictures of your setup?

              Mr. Wolfe




              Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
              1989 325i S50 swapped
              2007 4Runner Sport V8

              Comment


                #8
                Thanks for the pictures. I can deal with that amount of stretch, but not more.

                Mr. Wolfe
                sigpic

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Mr. Wolfe View Post
                  Thanks for the pictures. I can deal with that amount of stretch, but not more.

                  Mr. Wolfe
                  Didn't you used to have a white integra and was frequent on vadriven back in the day?
                  1989 325i S50 swapped
                  2007 4Runner Sport V8

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by bumada View Post
                    Didn't you used to have a white integra and was frequent on vadriven back in the day?
                    Nope, someone else. I had a few is300's back in the day and have been pretty much exclusively on the m3forum for the past 10 years.

                    Mr. Wolfe
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I've gone up in diameter to 24.6" rolling stock, speedo is actually more accurate and tire sizes seem to be much more common. Currently running 215/45/17. (yes I know not as bad to find as 16's) Makes 17"s look less funny.
                      Last edited by AwakenNoMore; 01-06-2016, 07:27 AM.
                      1991 325i - "Scambles" The Daily Driven lightly modded.
                      1988 Mazda RX-7 TII "Mako" The Free Dorito
                      bacon by Jared Laabs, on Flickr

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by bumada View Post
                        I ran into this same dilemma with my 16x8 and 16x9 setup. I ended up just doing a 215/45/16 on the front and backs. The fronts look good but the rears are stretched a bit. When you looked at different sizes, you couldn't get the same tires or even close to the same tread rating.
                        But wouldn't the contact patch be the same for both wheels, essentially defeating the purpose of running a wider tire in back?
                        sigpic
                        1987 - 325i Convertible Delphin Auto [SOLD], 325i Convertible Delphin Manual [SOLD]
                        1989 - 325i Convertible Bronzit m30b35 swapped [SCRAPPED], 325i Sedan Alpine Auto[DD]
                        1991 - 325i Coupe Laguna Manual [Project], 535i Sedan Alpine [SCRAPPED]

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Mr. Wolfe View Post
                          Nope, someone else. I had a few is300's back in the day and have been pretty much exclusively on the m3forum for the past 10 years.

                          Mr. Wolfe
                          Just did some research, his username was J.Wolfe. Sorry about that.
                          1989 325i S50 swapped
                          2007 4Runner Sport V8

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by AwakenNoMore View Post
                            I've gone up in diameter to 24.6" rolling stock, speedo is actually more acccurate and tire sizes seem to be much more common. Currently running 215/45/17. Makes 17"s look less funny.
                            I need to research this some more. What is stock rolling diameter? I guess I could look that up...

                            Originally posted by McGyver View Post
                            But wouldn't the contact patch be the same for both wheels, essentially defeating the purpose of running a wider tire in back?
                            You are correct, but I don't think everyone goes with a staggered setup for more tire, but for better aesthetics. Fatter lip, more concavity, etc. I struggle with this as I do like that look, but I am contemplating just doing a 16x8 all around.

                            Mr. Wolfe
                            sigpic

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by McGyver View Post
                              But wouldn't the contact patch be the same for both wheels, essentially defeating the purpose of running a wider tire in back?
                              Essentially unless it's for looks. I'm going a different route once I finish my s50 swap.
                              1989 325i S50 swapped
                              2007 4Runner Sport V8

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X