Apparently the fine members of this forum have misplaced their balls. 
If that's truly the case, you should anticipate and appreciate thoughts that aren't in agreement with your own.
Sounds like a nice car.
Depending on market trends, originality can be a huge asset when selling a car if the car is popular and in pristine condition or has significant historical value through a combination of rarity and desirability.
Preserving ripped seats instead of repairing them to factory specifications isn't going to increase the value of just about every classic car out there. Ripped seats are gross even in rat rods.
With all that stated, there have been many periods where fully restored cars brought the money, not survivors.
If you're never selling the car, why do you care so much about its value? Are you concerned on behalf of your heirs?
I agree on principle, though the two may overlap for many of us.
Rarity based on exterior and interior colour combinations has always struck me as trying too hard. I'm sure you have a nice car, and in my region (Ontario, Canada) finding a low mileage nearly rust free 1991 318is is an incredible challenge that isn't getting any easier with time, but they're only truly rare in the sense that there aren't many good ones left, and they seldom come up for sale; the same could be said about a 1991 CRX Si as they've all but rusted into dust here. Your car is rare today and special, but it isn't rare like an early M5, for example, to the point where modifying it significantly yet tastefully and in keeping with the original design ethos of the car would detract from its value.
I've owned two low mileage 1991 318is by the way, and though that took considerable effort and luck to accomplish it took me literally years to find my Canadian Edition M3, as there were only 45 of those. That, my friend, is rare, and yet I would and have still replaced what needed replacing in that car with factory parts.
Agreed. The whole concept of rarity is relative, too, as my E34 M5 is much more rare than my E30 M3.
Smart ass remarks? Please remove the sand from your vagina and reread the earlier posts. Nobody was being a smart ass, they were being honest.
After your butt has stopped hurting I have some final words for you on this subject: if it's original but shit, restore it; if it's original and nice, it's worth preserving.

Originally posted by Ant131313
View Post
Originally posted by Ant131313
View Post
Originally posted by Ant131313
View Post
Preserving ripped seats instead of repairing them to factory specifications isn't going to increase the value of just about every classic car out there. Ripped seats are gross even in rat rods.
With all that stated, there have been many periods where fully restored cars brought the money, not survivors.
Originally posted by Ant131313
View Post
Originally posted by varg
View Post
Originally posted by Ant131313
View Post
I've owned two low mileage 1991 318is by the way, and though that took considerable effort and luck to accomplish it took me literally years to find my Canadian Edition M3, as there were only 45 of those. That, my friend, is rare, and yet I would and have still replaced what needed replacing in that car with factory parts.
Originally posted by nando
View Post
Originally posted by Ant131313
View Post
Originally posted by Ant131313
View Post
Comment