What makes the E30 318is a fun driving car?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dnguyen1963
    R3VLimited
    • Nov 2011
    • 2648

    #61
    Damn...you guys must be way too young. Back in the '90s, Ford V8 in the Thunderbird made only 150 hp and it was a fun car to drive.

    Comment

    • ahrensNW
      E30 Mastermind
      • Mar 2015
      • 1716

      #62
      Originally posted by c0rbin9
      Maybe I'm just bitter about only having 145hp, but it seems like the 4AGE in particular has more potential than the M42.

      This guy for example: http://www.billzilla.org/4agmods.htm

      ...seems to think a 200hp 4AG is relatively easy to build.
      A 200hp m42 is literally the same to build as a 200hp 4AG.

      And they come in much better looking cars.
      Hank Ahrens
      1984 Alpine Coupe
      1978 911sc

      Comment

      • roguetoaster
        R3V OG
        • Jan 2012
        • 7754

        #63
        Originally posted by dnguyen1963
        Damn...you guys must be way too young. Back in the '90s, Ford V8 in the Thunderbird made only 150 hp and it was a fun car to drive.
        Sadly, both of those are debatable. The smart cookies took the 2.3 Lima turbo instead, which was probably the right choice.

        Comment

        • Hooffenstein HD
          Banned
          • Nov 2012
          • 1388

          #64
          An engine swap.

          Comment

          • Bimmerguy91
            E30 Modder
            • Jul 2012
            • 982

            #65
            Originally posted by ThatOneEuroE30
            Followed by being rear ended cause its so damn slow haha.
            I refreshed an M10 for a guy with an 84 318i with an automatic. It was literally the slowest most mind numbingly terrible experience of my life. I thought I was going to get killed on the interstate because it would barely go the speed limit lol.

            Comment

            • mr2peak
              R3VLimited
              • Aug 2008
              • 2388

              #66
              Originally posted by c0rbin9
              Maybe I'm just bitter about only having 145hp, but it seems like the 4AGE in particular has more potential than the M42.

              This guy for example: http://www.billzilla.org/4agmods.htm

              ...seems to think a 200hp 4AG is relatively easy to build.
              I owned an Mr2, a 200hp 4AG is an expensive engine due to all the competition use. Parts cost a lot, and the people who know how to port them charge more than most are willing to pay. A 240hp formula Atlantic engine revs to 11k, and requires block girdles, a reinforced and braced valve cover, and a host of other very very specialized parts to get there. $20k+ easily. I've heard rumors of ~300hp max.

              S42 was 308hp, but also a bit later in the tech department. I'd say both are somewhat evenly matched, but then you're still talking 1.6L vs 1.8L..
              Drive it hard. Maintain it well.


              Convertible Technical & Discussion
              A Topless Memorandum

              Comment

              • SkiFree
                R3VLimited
                • Jun 2011
                • 2766

                #67
                Originally posted by Bimmerguy91
                I refreshed an M10 for a guy with an 84 318i with an automatic. It was literally the slowest most mind numbingly terrible experience of my life. I thought I was going to get killed on the interstate because it would barely go the speed limit lol.
                Haha, ironic isn't it? An E30/M10 is not a fun car, but a little hotrod M10 in a 2002 is such a fun combo... go figure.
                ADAMS Autosport

                Comment

                • 5Toes
                  Banned
                  • May 2010
                  • 9836

                  #68
                  there is a 250hp+ m42 build on this forum. I too *think* the m42 is easy to get to 200hp. If I write it on a forum surely I know what Im talking about!

                  the m42 head is rumored to flow better than the s14. with itb kit and camshafts and standalone 200hp m42 is quote on quote easy. $4,000 to get there but who cares this is the internet.

                  m42 e30 is alot like a miata. 4 cylinder sports cars are the original sports car. Dont hate on the 318is, its a homage to the fun cars of the late 60s and before.

                  Comment

                  • MrBurgundy
                    R3V Elite
                    • Mar 2012
                    • 5307

                    #69
                    Originally posted by 5Toes
                    m42 e30 is alot like a miata.
                    pls ban
                    Current Collection: 1990 325is // 1987 325i Vert // 2003 525i 5spd // 1985 380SL // 1992 Ranger 5spd // 2005 Avalanche // 2024 Honda Grom SP // 2024 Yamaha XSR700 // 2024 Jeep Gladiator Rubicon

                    Comment

                    • roguetoaster
                      R3V OG
                      • Jan 2012
                      • 7754

                      #70
                      Originally posted by 5Toes
                      there is a 250hp+ m42 build on this forum. I too *think* the m42 is easy to get to 200hp. If I write it on a forum surely I know what Im talking about!

                      the m42 head is rumored to flow better than the s14. with itb kit and camshafts and standalone 200hp m42 is quote on quote easy. $4,000 to get there but who cares this is the internet.

                      m42 e30 is alot like a miata. 4 cylinder sports cars are the original sports car. Dont hate on the 318is, its a homage to the fun cars of the late 60s and before.
                      No, 250 is difficult to hit N/A and still have a 1,000 hour engine.

                      Doubt it, but the valve angles are probably better considering when it was developed versus the S14.

                      I can see that it might have been a riff off of the frenetic nature of Alfa twin cams.

                      If anything, it's a homage to emissions requirements and CAFE, but I stand by my original statement that it was probably a twin cam development mule, and a requirement to compete in the marketplace.

                      Comment

                      • TobyB
                        R3V Elite
                        • Oct 2011
                        • 5169

                        #71


                        This might make the M42 reasonably modern, in the power department...

                        t
                        now, sometimes I just mess with people. It's more entertaining that way. george graves

                        Comment

                        • c0rbin9
                          Mod Crazy
                          • Dec 2015
                          • 609

                          #72
                          But then the response of an M42 w/ lightened flywheel - gone.
                          1991 318is Brillantrot daily driver (slow restoration)

                          Comment

                          • Metallated
                            E30 Enthusiast
                            • Dec 2016
                            • 1070

                            #73
                            Originally posted by c0rbin9
                            But then the response of an M42 w/ lightened flywheel - gone.
                            Wait what?

                            I thought this would make the car quicker to respond?

                            I really like my 4-cylinder and this thread is kinda making me reconsider my M52 swap...

                            Comment

                            • carbon966
                              Noobie
                              • Apr 2017
                              • 29

                              #74
                              Originally posted by roguetoaster
                              Mmm, old time M42 hate, I love it. People have been going soft on my favorite E30 engine of late, and were starting to make me feel way too mainstream.
                              ..lol, you must of had a heavy foot!

                              over all, love all the answers!

                              Comment

                              • agent
                                Vice Grand Pubaa
                                • Mar 2010
                                • 7960

                                #75
                                must have had
                                Originally posted by kronus
                                would be in depending on tip slant and tube size

                                Comment

                                Working...