Well...why not? It was a group dyno and in fact...FREE! :p
...which means its not an accurate dyno? Please explain a bit more...I m clueless...
Well,about the 7000+ revlimiter,I ve asked in some forums (in here as well if I can remember right) and they say that it has to do with a changed resistance in the injection circuit and thats all there is to it really...no other mods! ;)
N.
Dynoed my totally stock M10!
Collapse
X
-
-
I have a carbed 316 m10, and it peaks at around 5.800 - 6.000 rpm, it pulls from 4.000 to 5.500, it's a wierd little engine, it acts like a high rev 4 cyl sometimes (in first and second) and like a larger engine in third and fourth (feels like it has some torque), but it really does not have much to give, my son's 1.6 chevy optra is a lot faster.
I love the car anyway, and the light engine helps a lot in cornering, even though the car has not enough torque to powerslide (on dry pavement).:)Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Whooo! At least it should be pretty difficult to get a speeding ticket...Leave a comment:
-
-
I assume 135Nm is the stock rated torque? If so, I'd say you're doing pretty good to get that close. You have to take into account drivetrain loss, which usually amounts to around 15%. The stock rating is dyno tested at the flywheel, which is impossible to replicate accurately on a chassis dyno.Well,12kg is like 118Mm which is definately NOT 135 (stock number)!
Whats your say on these numbers? Car is totally stock @ 100.000m!
Anyways, sounds decent to me.
BenLeave a comment:
-
I am confused with the graph, the numbers and the fact that you dynod a stock M10..Leave a comment:
-
Not even a KN filter in this car man!
The good thing is that the torque is somewhat linear at least...
N.Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: