I will be playing Counter Strike on this box, so it looks like I won't be able to fit within my budget.
And I have used Mac's extensively, they ain't my bag.
And I have used Mac's extensively, they ain't my bag.
-
-
I'd get 512 MB memory straight away, the rest of the system is a very ok desktop system. The motherboard can go a little faster if you use two memory modules rather than a single module, I would get 2x256 MB right now and then get a third 512 MB module later on when money allows. The motherboard manual outlines how they should be installed for optimal performance. Granted, it doesn't really give that much of a boost.
I would stay away from the many case fans, choose a silent CPU fan with a big heatsink and find a Radeon 9200 that has no cooling fan (just a big heatsink). Then install at most one 80 mm or larger intake fan (preferrably with a filter in front of it) that blows air across the hard drive (for reliability of your most valued component).
If a desktop computer is what you want, get it silent as well. (I watercool my computer)
Comment
-
I have 256 ram right now. I just got the new board and didnt have enough money for more DDR ram and my old ram was useless.
Somehow I manage to still edit in photoshop AND premier. But ya I need more ram. Asap.
Sold it.Comment
-
Well I've played CS on my 500mhz box with 256mb ram and 16mb graphics card. I use Photoshop ALL the time on it. So whatever I buy is going to be an upgrade, no matter how cheap the components.
Why is XP Pro so much better than Home?Comment
-
Right now I'm running a 99 Powerbook g3 333mhz. 128 ram, 4.5 gig baby... osX 10.2.8, with wireless cable connection. I can tell no speed different from my p2 350 gateway plugged into the wall. I spent about 300 bucks on everything. I wish I could afford something newer, but this comp is just fine. Too bad your not going through with the deal, that sounds like a nice set-up, but yea seems low with the 256 ram...Old and improved:
Comment
-
dude your new computer will run CS and even CZ just fine!Originally posted by Digitalwave
CS is soo old....considering it is constructed around the Quake 1 engine. Depending on your old graphics card.. u might not see any difference in how CS looks and feels with your new PC.Comment
-
If I don't see a different from the 15fps I get on my 500mhz system with a 16mb video card, I am not buying a new PC.Comment
-
Definetly invest in more RAM for that PowerBook, OS X will thank you. Try these guys if you're interested...Originally posted by EtaSport
Comment
-
It is actually running with the Quake 2 engine there retard boy.Originally posted by Schneider325Tenured Automotive Service Professional - Avid BMW Enthusiast
Vapor Honing & E30 ABS Pump Refurbishment Service
https://mtechniqueabs.com/Comment
-
wasnt the quake 2 engine based on the quake 1 engine?
Comment
-
-
It doesn't have as many idiot-proof things in it, not as much bullshit running in the background that you could do yourself. I think it's also a bit more stable.Originally posted by Digitalwave
Pro is made for people who actually know how to use a computer.Comment
-
yup, and Pro has been very stable for meOriginally posted by Eurospeed88Comment
-
you can disable all the newbie assits and other over simplified bs in XP Home, and it's no less stable than XP Professional. XP pro was designed mainly for business management, or to act as the administrator of a large network. it does have alot of extra's, but nothing significant to increase performance or stability; the biggest advantage for a home user would be more security. there's tons of info on XP Home vs Pro on google. here's one example:Originally posted by Eurospeed88
Comment
Comment