Thats what torches, grinders and welders are for hahaha! I couldn't pass it up. Less then 1200 miles on it with a stage 3 clutch.........$800 bucks. BOOM!
Ovalized piping for?? the tranny mount?
Apologize for possible thread jack...;)
New Here-My E30/5.0/GT45/C4
Collapse
X
-
Tremecs gonna take some big ass hammer work. Ive got a shitbox t5 and it seams to be taking the abuse. I used ovalized piping to same me some clearance as thats the lowest part of the car. Still only about 2.5" of ground clearance and im running 225/45/17s.Leave a comment:
-
Just took my nightly read through your thread, great inspiration!! my tremec tr-3550 will be showing up tomorrow!Leave a comment:
-
yeah you and me both about the wheels, they've been in the corner of my garage still in plastic until the car is completely finished. I don't want them on until the car is ready to go haha. ill be sticking with the 225/50's that are on the current wheels to save a bit of cash since they are damn near brand new. id go with a smaller size if lowering the car more was an option but the tranny pan for the C4 hangs down pretty low so its at a decently safe height now.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
that sound you hear is the collective sounds of m30b35 e30 owners dumping deuces in their pants..Leave a comment:
-
Ehh if i finally break something then maybe. As of now the rearend and suspension is holding up lolLeave a comment:
-
Fair nuf. Watch that 450 mark. Its that magic number that like to split blocksLeave a comment:
-
im trying to go with a more street friendly setup, keeping stock internals and a mild cam. so with the TFS 170's the maximum lift with 1.6 rockers is a .550 cam, and the one im planning has .543 so im almost at that point without having to worry about piston-to-valve clearances all too much. plus with the 170 heads, cam, and little extras it will make enough power for me lol.Leave a comment:
-
I can tell you after driving both an m20 and a 5.0 e30. The e30 actually has better distrobution with the 5.0. Also why not 185 or 190 head with the turbo?Leave a comment:
-
I've been searching and searching for an isky groove-o-matic......no luck though. If I can get my hands on that it'll allow me to put the motor together a little differently.Leave a comment:
-
I'm not arguing that its not heavier, and your number make sense but I don't think that are completely relative. If the 302 sat in the exact same location as the m20 then your number would be dead on and I would fully agree. but the 302 is shorter the the m20, now with the auto and the ease of placing a shift just about anywhere you want this may not apply, but in my case with the tremec to get a good comfortable location for the shifter the motor has to be mounted much further back. In my case its going to take some firewall manipulation to make it work how I want.Thanks for the advice, i too have done research.
Here there are the different weights for the motors.
If the m20 weighs 258lbs and with your numbers that would be between 313-338lbs for the 5.0
According to this, having an m20 would give you a 53/47 weight distribution. Doing some quick calcs, that would mean that you have roughly 170lbs more in the front.
So with the addition of the 5.0 weight, that extra 55-80lb should make an impact. (up to a 56/44 weight distribution)
Point is, your car should handle better when your distribution is closer to 50/50...no mater how sophisticated your suspension might be.
Sorry OP for the threadjack.
So yes its heavier, but your are distributing the weight further behind the front axle then the m20, the ratio might change to a degree but there are plenty that have done this and are very satisfied with the results.
is all else fails........add a ballast :-PLeave a comment:

Leave a comment: