If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I think he means that it didn't work out this time. Its not as vivid as an HDR image should be. Its all about practice. I haven't gotten one good result when attempting HDR and i haven't posted them because of that. I would point you to photography-on-the.net. There are a lot of professionals on that site that can give you constructive criticism and pointers that will be a big help.
I think he means that it didn't work out this time. Its not as vivid as an HDR image should be. Its all about practice. I haven't gotten one good result when attempting HDR and i haven't posted them because of that. I would point you to photography-on-the.net. There are a lot of professionals on that site that can give you constructive criticism and pointers that will be a big help.
HDR does not mean "cartoon like vivid details". That is just taking HDR to the extreme.
THIS shot is also an 'HDR' from 3 images. No other way to get all the shadow/highlight detail with a single shot with the lighting and being behind a tall building. No one would say "OMG NICE HDR" ;)
That is just one of those photos that make people who use HDR as a tool mad. That shot could have been properly exposed in ONE single exposure. Instead someone made it look like a cartoon in photoshop with HDR. And the worst part... it supposedly is white.
Comment