This is how a thread debate should be, Japandrew should take note. This looks very promising and I love the concept of the vertically mounted engine.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MGB + M42 = Win
Collapse
X
-
No.
I'm saying, either machine off, or have mounting plates cut and fab up a manifold that has the mounting surface for the TB on the cyl#1 end, then mount air meter in front of radiator to get cooler air into engine, also cut down on hose mess under OE manifold and clean that whole mess up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View PostNo.
I'm saying, either machine off, or have mounting plates cut and fab up a manifold that has the mounting surface for the TB on the cyl#1 end, then mount air meter in front of radiator to get cooler air into engine, also cut down on hose mess under OE manifold and clean that whole mess up.IG: deniso_nsi Leave me feedback here
Comment
-
Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View PostNo.
I'm saying, either machine off, or have mounting plates cut and fab up a manifold that has the mounting surface for the TB on the cyl#1 end, then mount air meter in front of radiator to get cooler air into engine, also cut down on hose mess under OE manifold and clean that whole mess up.
It would be pretty simple as the M42 intake manifold is two piece. The first part that bolts to the head holds the injectors and is only a few inches long. A plenum could easily be attached to this, but I think at this point it is unnecessary work. I haven't even gotten to the point of worrying about the intake though. Need to get the engine mounted first.
Comment
-
Exactly. There are a lot of options, and the 666 style, but smaller volume, and closer to the block would better suit you, but it's not the toughest thing to produce. And, yeah, the exact reason I suggested it was because of the two-piece design, and the fact that the injectors are housed separate of the upper plenum.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LJ851 View PostNow you're talkin. How much torque can those rearends take?
Sometime in the future I'd like to go to a 4-link setup in the rear and will probably swap to a Ford 9" or similar, so for now, the stock rear end isn't an issue.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NitroRustlerDriver View PostIt looks like in the stock position, the exhaust side would actually hold a bit of oil over the valves. Not much, but a bit. Rotating it would lessen this and only slightly increase the amount that puddles on the intake side, less then the exhaust would have in the stock position. This is very good news as I now know for a fact that tilting the engine will not cause drainage problems.Originally posted by !kid View Posti was reading through one of my ASE books last night about this. the most common cause of oil consumption issues is bad valve guide seals and or worn guides.
"A faulty intake valve seal allows oil to be drawn into the cylinder during the intake stroke."
"This results in burnt oil exhaust smoke when the engine decelerates because the oil is not being diluted with gasoline during that time.":borg:
Comment
Comment