-
I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true". -
Last edited by Liam; 05-01-2009, 08:52 AM.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
Well I am home from court.
Thank god (or evolution by natural selection) that drug addiction is a "progressive disease" because the crazy lady has lost her edge.
Her petition read like the rantings of an inpatient depicted in a B film.
I prevailed (so far) and the kids remain in my full custody.
/my rant (ish)I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
Nice!!!
Did she show up all crazy and drugged up?1985 325e 2.8 Turbo VEMSComment
-
I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
before and after pics?
*congrats on the win btw!Last edited by dgspikes; 05-01-2009, 08:29 PM.Comment
-
Wow, divorce really bites and the play just goes on and on and on. My parents divorce took 7 years of fighting in the courts and another twenty of pure hate toward one another. Any way you look at it, it just isn't pretty!The difference between porcupines and BMWs is that porcupines have the pricks on the outside!Comment
-
i went thru this shit about 19 years ago. i spent enough money in court to almost put both of my kids through college and i lost. and then after i lost my ex wife said "ok, you can have custody". to this day i will never understand her. regardless keep your head up and do the right thing for your kids at any cost. 20 years later they will recognize what you did and thank you for itComment
Comment