RIP Michael Jackson
Collapse
X
-
I remember reading an article in Vanity Fair from back when MJ was accused of sleeping with the boy. It was pretty descriptive. From what I remember, he would regularly spend the night at this boys house. It wasn't just a once or twice type of thing. The article went into how MJ would jack off the boy, etc., etc.. But really, how can anyone say it's okay for a grown man to go to a little boys house and sleep in his bed with him?Comment
-
So what you're saying is, you read an article about how MJ went to some kid's house, under the permission of the kid's parents, sleeping back and teddy bear in-tow, and had a sleepover? I don't buy it. Let's see the article.
I remember reading an article in Highlights for Children from back when Ronald McDonald was accused of sleeping with Strawberry Shortcake. It was pretty descriptive. From what I remember, he would regularly spend the night at Strawberry's house. It wasn't just a once or twice type of thing. The article went into how Strawberry would jack off Ronald, etc., etc.. But really, how can anyone say it's okay for a grown man to go to a little Strawberry's house and sleep in her bed with her?
See? I just wrote that on the internet. That means I must have read it somewhere, and it's probably true.Comment
-
The kid's parents were divorced and the mother had custody. I'll look for the article, but it wasn't the relationship (sleepovers, etc) that MJ disputed, it was what happened when he was in the room alone with the boy that they argued over. MJ supposedly paid out $25 million.So what you're saying is, you read an article about how MJ went to some kid's house, under the permission of the kid's parents, sleeping back and teddy bear in-tow, and had a sleepover? I don't buy it. Let's see the article.
I remember reading an article in Highlights for Children from back when Ronald McDonald was accused of sleeping with Strawberry Shortcake. It was pretty descriptive. From what I remember, he would regularly spend the night at Strawberry's house. It wasn't just a once or twice type of thing. The article went into how Strawberry would jack off Ronald, etc., etc.. But really, how can anyone say it's okay for a grown man to go to a little Strawberry's house and sleep in her bed with her?
See? I just wrote that on the internet. That means I must have read it somewhere, and it's probably true.Comment
-
the guy was a frickin whacked out weirdo! i don't care how talented he was or how unbelievable his moon walk was. if he came any where near me or any one in my family especially my nephew i'd whack him in the face hard enough to knock that silly putty nose right off his bleached white face! this guy had some deep psychological problems.
you can say what ever you want but he was not normal. i don't know any one ells that makes their kids walk around in masks. also who has a kids zoo in or around their house. think about it. me and all the other normal strait single guys on here keep things in and around our houses and persons that we hope will attract chicks, and that's just what mike was doing only he was getting little kids. creeps the hell out of me.
i known child molesters and he was one.
i wont miss him and i bet you there are some other people including some kids that are happy he is gone as well.it's funny how so many people base their beliefs on magazines and what's in the news. insecurities ftl.
RIP Michael, you will be missed.
plus he sounded like he had his nuts cut off when he was 6.sigpic
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten."
Comment
-
You can say Wikipedia is crap, but here's what I'm talking about:
I think this is the article I'm talking about (but I don't have time to read it (wife's pissed I"m not leaving for dinner yet)): http://www.vanityfair.com/magazine/a.../01/orth199401
Listen, I could be wrong. Researching this stuff is not a hobby of mine.Comment
-
How so? It is directly comparable, and it is perfectly sound logic. If indisputable evidence is the only thing that makes someone guilty then there are a whole lot of people sitting in jail/prison that shouldn't be.
It is a good comparison because in both cases we are shown what a person can get exonerated of if they have the financial means to pay a good attorney.
Comment
-
It is not a good comparison, and it is seriously flawed logic! There was physical evidence, the scientific kind that implicated OJ and he got off on a technicality.How so? It is directly comparable, and it is perfectly sound logic. If indisputable evidence is the only thing that makes someone guilty then there are a whole lot of people sitting in jail/prison that shouldn't be.
It is a good comparison because in both cases we are shown what a person can get exonerated of if they have the financial means to pay a good attorney.
The only thing implicating Michael Jackson was circumstantial evidence. It was all heresay and I for one wouldn't entirely trust the word of someone who had a $20 million dollar carrot dangling in front them.Comment
-
MJ didn't fuck any little boys. It's sad so many people think he did.
While I don't believe he did such a thing, for the record, I'd let MJ jack me off all day long for $25 mil.Originally posted by e30devo25mil aint fixing shit in your head after mj jacked you off as a little boy.Comment
-





Comment