Originally posted by franco90
View Post
-
thanks for letting us know!
-
This is just fucking bizare...
That was your whole list?I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
Of the people I don't like, there are a ton of people that I like, but I was too lazy to post them all.Originally posted by Liam View Post
SC*AR
Originally posted by JamesE30Comment
-
That's what I mean... Short list... You must be a very tolerant guy.Originally posted by Alkasquawlik View PostI'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
I guess, most of the guys on here are great save for the couple fuck tards.Originally posted by Liam View Post
SC*AR
Originally posted by JamesE30Comment
-
I guess you're probably right.Originally posted by Alkasquawlik View Post
The fucktards make a lot of noise though... Makes them seem more prevalent.I'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
i dont want to be involved in anything with the words pierre, suck my dick, berryessa run and alkacumguzzler in the same sentence. you waffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswaffless make a strong case for jflips heterosexuality claimOriginally posted by Alkasquawlik View PostComment
-
Hmmm, I'm not even sure I understood this.Originally posted by blunt View PostI'm Not Right in the Head | Random Rants and other Nonsense1st Order Logic Failure: Association fallacy, this type of fallacy can be expressed as (∃x ∈ S : φ(x)) → (∀x ∈ S : φ(x)), meaning "if there exists any x in the set S so that a property φ is true for x, then for all x in S the property φ must be true".Comment
-
We're close to Carl. You should come visit and we'll all indulge in some dirty, raunchy penis pleasures.Originally posted by blunt View Post
SC*AR
Originally posted by JamesE30Comment
-
i would rather tongue your browneye than see carlOriginally posted by Alkasquawlik View PostComment
-
You can come see Carl, tongue my browneye, then tongue his browneye after. Best of both worlds. We'll even return the favor depending on your expertise.Originally posted by blunt View Post
SC*AR
Originally posted by JamesE30Comment
-
Actually, most of these kids are still in high school, if not just out of.Originally posted by Massive Lee View Post
Honestly, who cares? This not high school anymore. Your days as a cheerleader are behind you. Get over it
Or mentally stunted. ;)
Um... The Zen guy, hot or not? OMG BRB.
Contact me on myspace!
Blunt: That guy in your avatar . He's a waffleswaffleswaffleswaffles.
Comment
-
i would fall under the "mentally stunted " columnOriginally posted by LowR3V'in View Post
what was that fuckers name? i just came across his picComment
-
what up Blunt
I see all this assholes want to be hard ..
but thats cool I guess this is a forum.
I've always been proud of being a Marine.
I won't hesitate to defend the Corps
"Supersquad"
"Prostitutes are a sub-category of Amusement Parks"-Comment
Comment