Clunkers: Taxpayers paid $24,000 per car

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by Under_Pressure
    Ok so your going to tell me the old 14mpg average cars that are now junked and replaced by 20+mpg cleaner burning cars makes no impact? No matter how miniscule the amount it is less so just STFU. If your so smart wtf are you doing about it?
    you need to remember the carbon released in the manufacture of a new car, from iron ore mining to steel smelting to oil into plastics production etc

    you want to be green? forget the cash to clunkers BS that did nothing but move economic activity forward at the expense of economic activity later. buy a used car or keep the clunker.

    Leave a comment:


  • kishg
    replied
    Originally posted by Dyno4mance
    Forget C4C We are entering very scary times...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5d...layer_embedded
    tin foil hat on and heading down to nukulear bunker right now..

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by Massive Lee
    "Clunkers: Taxpayers paid $24,000 per car"

    Hey VDubin, as you seem to excell in calculation, can you tell us how much sending troups to Iraq and Afghanistan has cost per capita. Another price that was paid is the human lives. How much was that other cost?
    its not your fight

    Leave a comment:


  • Massive Lee
    replied
    "Clunkers: Taxpayers paid $24,000 per car"

    Hey VDubin, as you seem to excell in calculation, can you tell us how much sending troups to Iraq and Afghanistan has cost per capita. Another price that was paid is the human lives. How much was that other cost?
    Last edited by Massive Lee; 10-30-2009, 02:25 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dyno4mance
    replied
    Forget C4C We are entering very scary times...

    Leave a comment:


  • kishg
    replied
    I am no fan of C4C, but let's clear the air a little:

    1. It was never intended as a green program. It was clearly a life vest to domestic auto
    2. The Edmunds "analysis" is based on what-if analysis, which is hokey
    3. It did spur Q3 GDP and kept at least some jobs from being lost in the auto sector
    4. It pales in comparison to the $500k/soldier we'll need to spend to add troops to Afghanistan

    So clearly while it is a very tactical shot in the arm that may not yield much in the way of long term sustainability in the auto sector, we can clearly find worse ways to spend money. I find it funny that the so called fiscal conservatives never criticize the obscene expenditure that this administration is making on foreign wars but harps on these?

    Leave a comment:


  • Under_Pressure
    replied
    Im no hippie beleve me I would not want Florida to get emmisions again, I wouldnt be able to build my cars. I just wanted to get my .2 in and thats all.

    Leave a comment:


  • blunttech
    replied
    i believe this makes me a tree hugging green hippy as anything i drive i transplant a more modern efficient motor into it. im lessening my carbon footprint by slapping an s14 in my 02.
    eat a co2 laden dick

    Leave a comment:


  • dinanm3atl
    replied
    Originally posted by Under_Pressure
    Ok so your going to tell me the old 14mpg average cars that are now junked and replaced by 20+mpg cleaner burning cars makes no impact? No matter how miniscule the amount it is less so just STFU. If your so smart wtf are you doing about it?
    I guess it makes some 'feel' better which is what the green movement is all about isn't it?

    Going from 14 to 20mpg? Who cares. That is a drop in a 55 gallon drum. You take someone that was driving a 'clunker' and consider the car is worth LESS than 4500 dollars. Do you believe that they should take the 4500, grab a car payment? Keep in mind a loan REQUIRES full coverage insurance. So you have to consider that as well. Did they have full coverage on their clunker before?

    Do you remember what got us here? Government promoting giving those that cannot and should not home loans... but hell yes let's get some people home loans and now give away taxpayer money to fund SOMEONE ELSE getting a new car.

    Sure does make you 'feel' good doesn't it? Remove many good used cars and trash their motors. Don't let someone buy the running motor to swap into a car that needs a motor. Carbon to crush cars, carbon to transport clunkers, carbon to build a new car(that is crappy and might last 100K) and more carbon to transport new cars to dealers... should we go on?

    Leave a comment:


  • TDE30
    replied
    Originally posted by Under_Pressure
    To each there own but this always falls true keep politics and religion to oneself.
    So you are wrong?

    Because I always thought just walking outside and lighting my car on fire would benefit future generations. Could I be wrong?!?!

    Leave a comment:


  • Under_Pressure
    replied
    To each there own but this always falls true keep politics and religion to oneself.

    Leave a comment:


  • StereoInstaller1
    replied
    Originally posted by TDE30
    McCain and his Harvard grad VP done any better, who knows?
    I LOL'd

    Leave a comment:


  • TDE30
    replied
    Originally posted by Under_Pressure
    Ok so your going to tell me the old 14mpg average cars that are now junked and replaced by 20+mpg cleaner burning cars makes no impact? No matter how miniscule the amount it is less so just STFU. If your so smart wtf are you doing about it?
    So you think that the complete destruction of a working, running automobile is "green" decision? You must also think that nobody on this planet may have wanted or needed that "clunker"?

    Do you also believe in the tooth fairy and Santa Claus as well?




    Note: I'm not jumping on E30Cabrio and (ctrl+V)edubin's "WARARAAAAGHHH, THE (dot) GOVERNMENTTT!!!" bandwagon, but I do think the C4C program was a poor decision to jumpstart the economy. Could McCain and his Harvard grad VP done any better, who knows?

    Leave a comment:


  • Under_Pressure
    replied
    Originally posted by shiftbmw
    This thread is retarded, and you fit in quite nicely here.
    Ok so your going to tell me the old 14mpg average cars that are now junked and replaced by 20+mpg cleaner burning cars makes no impact? No matter how miniscule the amount it is less so just STFU. If your so smart wtf are you doing about it?

    Leave a comment:


  • kishg
    replied
    Originally posted by mrsleeve
    wow the population of tool bags and Hippie dip shits around here increase exponentially every week.
    agree.. god knows there were enough tools here to begin with..

    Leave a comment:

Working...