^This
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
48÷2(9+3) = ???
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Raxe View PostIt matters because when you rewrite the equation it comes out like this:
48
2(9+3)
aka
48
24
48
2(9+3) = 48÷(2(9+3)) not equal to 48÷2(9+3)
The standard order of operations, or precedence, is expressed in the following chart.
terms inside brackets
exponents and roots
multiplication and division
addition and subtraction
multiply and divide in the order the operations occurLast edited by tjts1; 04-08-2011, 06:17 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tjts1 View Post48
2(9+3) = 48/(2(9+3)) not equal to 48÷2(9+3)
You fail
Comment
-
^^^^^^^^^^^^
I think I finally agree with you on somethingOriginally posted by FusionIf a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
William Pitt-
Comment
-
The distributive property of multiplication CLEARLY states that the 2(9+3) is an entire statement and CANNOT be broken up. 2(9+3) follows the distributive property which can be rewritten as (2*9+2*3). Let me repeat the 2 outside of the parenthesis follows the distributive property of multiplication and must be factored and simplified before performing any other operations on it. You do NOT compute this expression from left to right until you use Algebra to simplify the statement 2(9+3).
So this can be rewritten as:
48 / (2*9 + 2*3)
Which leaves us with
48 / 24 = 2
Answer = 2.
Comment
-
It's not sad at all... it's correct.
The general consensus among math people is that "multiplication by juxtaposition" (that is, multiplying by just putting things next to each other, rather than using the "×" sign) indicates that the juxtaposed values must be multiplied together before processing other operations.
Comment
Comment