48÷2(9+3) = ???

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • reelizmpro
    R3V OG
    • Dec 2003
    • 9448

    #76
    Did you 288 guys even read what I wrote?

    Here's more proof the answer is 2.

    "The distributive property of multiplication CLEARLY states that the 2(9+3) is an entire statement and CANNOT be broken up. 2(9+3) follows the distributive property which can be rewritten as (2*9+2*3). Let me repeat the 2 outside of the parenthesis follows the distributive property of multiplication and must be factored and simplified before performing any other operations on it. You do NOT compute this expression from left to right until you use Algebra to simplify the statement 2(9+3).

    So this can be rewritten as:
    48 / (2*9 + 2*3)

    Which leaves us with

    48 / 24 = 2

    Answer = 2.

    Lastly for those using Google or any other online calculator. These do not understand many theorems or properties so you must explicitly explain what you mean. There is a difference between 48 / 2 * (9+3) and 48 / 2(9+3). The first notation reads 48 / 2 * 1(9+3) while the second reads 48 / (2*9+2*3). Be very careful with your signs."

    As a EE who has worked with many scientific calculators and programs like MATLAB, etc. The guy I quoted above is right. Have to be careful of signage and calculators are very picky on how you input it.
    Last edited by reelizmpro; 04-09-2011, 10:38 AM.
    "I'd probably take the E30 M3 in this case just because I love that little car, and how tanky that inline 6 is." - thecj

    85 323i M TECH 1 S52 - ALPINEWEISS/SCHWARZE
    88 M3 - LACHSSILBER/SCHWARZE
    89 M3 - ALPINEWEISS II/M TECH CLOTH-ALCANTARA
    91 M TECHNIC CABRIO TURBO - MACAOBLAU/M TECH CLOTH-LEATHER

    Comment

    • ck_taft325is
      R3V OG
      • Sep 2007
      • 6880

      #77
      Why.
      Need a part? PM me.

      Get your Bass on. Luke's r3v Boxes are here: http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=198123

      Comment

      • frankenbeemer
        R3VLimited
        • Sep 2009
        • 2260

        #78
        Distributive property: The sum of two numbers times a third number is equal to the sum of each addend times the third number. For example 4 * (6 + 3) = 4*6 + 4*3


        Where does it indicate this special case where I must ignore the order of operations?
        sigpic
        Originally posted by JinormusJ
        Don't buy an e30

        They're stupid
        1989 325is Raged on then sold.
        1988 325 SETA 2DR Beaten to death, then parted.
        1988 325 SETA 4DR Parted.
        1990 325i Cabrio Daily'd, then stored 2 yrs ago.

        Comment

        • LivingLegend06
          E30 Mastermind
          • Dec 2006
          • 1604

          #79
          It's 288.

          Everyone who doesn't think so is probably a woman because they suck at math. You hear that guys, I just called you all girls.

          Comment

          • reelizmpro
            R3V OG
            • Dec 2003
            • 9448

            #80
            Originally posted by frankenbeemer
            Distributive property: The sum of two numbers times a third number is equal to the sum of each addend times the third number. For example 4 * (6 + 3) = 4*6 + 4*3


            Where does it indicate this special case where I must ignore the order of operations?
            It follows the order of operations. Parentheses first. 2(9+3) can either be 2(12) OR ((2*9 + 2*3))...agreed? Parentheses are still there until you multiply through to get 24...agreed? Don't convert the () into *, the multiplication occurs through the distributive property. This is the key. This is why you multiply first. Work it out on paper, the old fashioned way to eliminate this left to right business.
            Last edited by reelizmpro; 04-09-2011, 10:57 AM.
            "I'd probably take the E30 M3 in this case just because I love that little car, and how tanky that inline 6 is." - thecj

            85 323i M TECH 1 S52 - ALPINEWEISS/SCHWARZE
            88 M3 - LACHSSILBER/SCHWARZE
            89 M3 - ALPINEWEISS II/M TECH CLOTH-ALCANTARA
            91 M TECHNIC CABRIO TURBO - MACAOBLAU/M TECH CLOTH-LEATHER

            Comment

            • rwh11385
              lance_entities
              • Oct 2003
              • 18403

              #81
              Originally posted by reelizmpro
              Did you 288 guys even read what I wrote?

              Here's more proof the answer is 2.

              "The distributive property of multiplication CLEARLY states that the 2(9+3) is an entire statement and CANNOT be broken up. 2(9+3) follows the distributive property which can be rewritten as (2*9+2*3). Let me repeat the 2 outside of the parenthesis follows the distributive property of multiplication and must be factored and simplified before performing any other operations on it. You do NOT compute this expression from left to right until you use Algebra to simplify the statement 2(9+3).

              So this can be rewritten as:
              48 / (2*9 + 2*3)

              Which leaves us with

              48 / 24 = 2

              Answer = 2.

              Lastly for those using Google or any other online calculator. These do not understand many theorems or properties so you must explicitly explain what you mean. There is a difference between 48 / 2 * (9+3) and 48 / 2(9+3). The first notation reads 48 / 2 * 1(9+3) while the second reads 48 / (2*9+2*3). Be very careful with your signs."

              As a EE who has worked with many scientific calculators and programs like MATLAB, etc. The guy I quoted above is right. Have to be careful of signage and calculators are very picky on how you input it.
              Nowhere does it say that distributive property means the statement cannot be broken up. Order of operations has you do inside the parentheses and then after look for MD operations, but nowhere does it say that this multiplication is magically more important than the division to the left of it - whether or not there used to be a parens attached to it.

              It should be 48/2*12.

              If you wanted to distribute it out, then could rewrite as (48/2*9+48/2*3)

              Example:
              2(9+3) = 18 + 6 = 24

              What if you wanted to take one third of that?
              1/3*2(9+3)=(2/3*9+2/3*3)=8

              And one half of that?
              1/3(9+3)=(9/3+3/3)=4 ..... NOT 1/(27+9) = 1/36
              Last edited by rwh11385; 04-09-2011, 10:54 AM.

              Comment

              • reelizmpro
                R3V OG
                • Dec 2003
                • 9448

                #82
                Originally posted by rwh11385
                Nowhere does it say that distributive property means the statement cannot be broken up. Order of operations has you do inside the parentheses and then after look for MD operations, but nowhere does it say that this multiplication is magically more important than the division to the left of it - whether or not there used to be a parens attached to it.

                It should be 48/2*12.

                If you wanted to distribute it out, then could rewrite as (48/2*9+48/2*3)

                Example:
                2(9+3) = 18 + 6 = 24

                What if you wanted to take one third of that?
                1/3*2(9+3)=(2/3*9+2/3*3)=8

                And one half of that?
                1/3(9+3)=(9/3+3/3)=4 ..... NOT 1/(27+9) = 1/36
                WHAT? Okay, look... stop using *. This operation occurs in the distributive property of algebra. It's understood. To properly type the expression online or in a calculator: 48/(2(12)). If you want, you could simplify 48/2(12) and get 24/12 = 2. If you do it on paper, it'll make more sense.
                "I'd probably take the E30 M3 in this case just because I love that little car, and how tanky that inline 6 is." - thecj

                85 323i M TECH 1 S52 - ALPINEWEISS/SCHWARZE
                88 M3 - LACHSSILBER/SCHWARZE
                89 M3 - ALPINEWEISS II/M TECH CLOTH-ALCANTARA
                91 M TECHNIC CABRIO TURBO - MACAOBLAU/M TECH CLOTH-LEATHER

                Comment

                • frankenbeemer
                  R3VLimited
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 2260

                  #83
                  Originally posted by reelizmpro
                  WHAT? Okay, look... stop using *. This operation occurs in the distributive property of algebra. It's understood. To properly type the expression online or in a calculator: 48/(2(12)). If you want, you could simplify 48/2(12) and get 24/12 = 2. If you do it on paper, it'll make more sense.
                  Can you provide a link to this "understood" property? I don't understand it.
                  sigpic
                  Originally posted by JinormusJ
                  Don't buy an e30

                  They're stupid
                  1989 325is Raged on then sold.
                  1988 325 SETA 2DR Beaten to death, then parted.
                  1988 325 SETA 4DR Parted.
                  1990 325i Cabrio Daily'd, then stored 2 yrs ago.

                  Comment

                  • rwh11385
                    lance_entities
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 18403

                    #84
                    Originally posted by reelizmpro
                    WHAT? Okay, look... stop using *. This operation occurs in the distributive property of algebra. It's understood. To properly type the expression online or in a calculator: 48/(2(12)). If you want, you could simplify 48/2 and get 24/12 = 2. If you do it on paper, it'll make more sense.
                    That's not how it was written. You're making assumptions when you write it as 48/(2(12)). If that were the case, it should have been written 48/(2(9+3)), not 48/2(9+3). NOWHERE does it state that your way is the proper way to read it. Almost all cases of distributive property does not have more than the three variables, so it's your assumption that it ought to be performed as a whole before the rest, but that's not right.

                    In every order of operations lesson, you should do what is in the parentheses first, and then treat the multiplication as just that.. but not necessarily before any other of the same level of operator.

                    Simplify 48/2(9+3) into 24(9+3). And what is the result??? You simplified it into dividing by 12 when it is supposed to be multiplying.

                    Comment

                    • Sean
                      R3V Elite
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 5793

                      #85
                      288.

                      Oh ya, and put rob on that poll dammit!
                      - Sean Hayes

                      Comment

                      • reelizmpro
                        R3V OG
                        • Dec 2003
                        • 9448

                        #86
                        Originally posted by rwh11385
                        That's not how it was written. You're making assumptions when you write it as 48/(2(12)). If that were the case, it should have been written 48/(2(9+3)), not 48/2(9+3). NOWHERE does it state that your way is the proper way to read it. Almost all cases of distributive property does not have more than the three variables, so it's your assumption that it ought to be performed as a whole before the rest, but that's not right.

                        In every order of operations lesson, you should do what is in the parentheses first, and then treat the multiplication as just that.. but not necessarily before any other of the same level of operator.

                        Simplify 48/2(9+3) into 24(9+3). And what is the result??? You simplified it into dividing by 12 when it is supposed to be multiplying.
                        Look you are solving it wrong. Stop going left to right. It is NOT 48/2 multiplied by (9+3). You said it yourself...Parentheses first remember? 48/(18+6) OR 48/2(12). Why are the parentheses still there? because the 2 is distributed INTO them as it is part of the expression "2(9+3)". Then parentheses are no longer needed after adding the (18+6) = 24 OR 2 multiplied by 12 all UNDER 48. ONLY then are the parentheses no longer needed. Write it down on paper 48 OVER 2(9+3). Get rid of the parentheses first and tell me what you get.

                        By the way. Even if you simplify...it's still 24 OVER (9+3). This is allowed because the 2 was factored out but the rest of the expression is still DIVIDED into the numerator. The significance of the 2 outside of the parentheses is that it is a FACTOR of what's inside. Again, write it all out. 48 OVER 2(9+3).

                        The Left to right business is really elementary and is the last rule to follow with all operations being equal. Doesn't really have a place here with this type of problem. Parentheses first...and you get rid of them through distributing (multiplying) and adding before you do anything else.
                        Last edited by reelizmpro; 04-09-2011, 12:45 PM.
                        "I'd probably take the E30 M3 in this case just because I love that little car, and how tanky that inline 6 is." - thecj

                        85 323i M TECH 1 S52 - ALPINEWEISS/SCHWARZE
                        88 M3 - LACHSSILBER/SCHWARZE
                        89 M3 - ALPINEWEISS II/M TECH CLOTH-ALCANTARA
                        91 M TECHNIC CABRIO TURBO - MACAOBLAU/M TECH CLOTH-LEATHER

                        Comment

                        • frankenbeemer
                          R3VLimited
                          • Sep 2009
                          • 2260

                          #87
                          Let's see:

                          Get rid of the parenteses, 48/29+3.

                          = 4.65517241
                          sigpic
                          Originally posted by JinormusJ
                          Don't buy an e30

                          They're stupid
                          1989 325is Raged on then sold.
                          1988 325 SETA 2DR Beaten to death, then parted.
                          1988 325 SETA 4DR Parted.
                          1990 325i Cabrio Daily'd, then stored 2 yrs ago.

                          Comment

                          • frankenbeemer
                            R3VLimited
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 2260

                            #88
                            Please add 4.65517241 to the poll.
                            sigpic
                            Originally posted by JinormusJ
                            Don't buy an e30

                            They're stupid
                            1989 325is Raged on then sold.
                            1988 325 SETA 2DR Beaten to death, then parted.
                            1988 325 SETA 4DR Parted.
                            1990 325i Cabrio Daily'd, then stored 2 yrs ago.

                            Comment

                            • imsotyerred
                              R3VLimited
                              • Oct 2005
                              • 2529

                              #89
                              PEMDAS fucking rules

                              2 nitwits
                              BRUTE

                              Comment

                              • frankenbeemer
                                R3VLimited
                                • Sep 2009
                                • 2260

                                #90
                                When you add 9 + 3 you get 12, then you are done with the parenthetical element. At that point, you return to the left because multiplication and division are equal operators. I have yet to see the rule which states that 2(some operation) is different from 2*(some operation) or 2 x (some operation).
                                sigpic
                                Originally posted by JinormusJ
                                Don't buy an e30

                                They're stupid
                                1989 325is Raged on then sold.
                                1988 325 SETA 2DR Beaten to death, then parted.
                                1988 325 SETA 4DR Parted.
                                1990 325i Cabrio Daily'd, then stored 2 yrs ago.

                                Comment

                                Working...