Psychotic killers dont right manifestos with with pretty decent grammar and punctuation. Really? What evidence do you have to support this? You are aware that the standard serial-killer formula is a middle-aged white male with above-average intelligence, right? Plus these "murders" have not been proven except for the cops that got shot trying to apprehend him. Pardon my candor, but you are delusional to think otherwise. I'm all for, "innocent until proven guilty", but believe me, there is more than enough evidence to convict Dorner of these murders even now. Mind you all but one of the deaths were police force related. Interesting observation, but I'm not sure what you mean by saying, "all but one of the deaths was police force related."? Elaborate, please.
Also, from the manifesto he wasn't boo hooing as you say, from what it says they were being fairly cruel and racist not only to fellow officers but also to convicts/apprehended people. Just because you get a badge doesn't mean you get to beat on people when you like. We have a difference of opinion here. I've read his manifesto and in my opinion it does make him out to be a chronic complainer. Now, whether or not each and every situation was justified is not for me to discuss, because they are moot points with regards to his actions. The same goes for your comment about, "...a badge doesn't mean you get to beat on people when you like.". I completely and utterly agree with you, but again, that's not the point. The point is for all his rhetoric, NONE of it is a justification to start a killing spree.
Still, Criminal, psycho, or not, burning someone to death is redic, and if they heard a shot and assumed he was dead why fire tear gas into it. Honestly they should have quarantined the area of suspect, evacuated all the innocents, then waited it out with snipers or military units. Trying to "take him down" as they would say, only risks more lives and is a waste of resources. I'm not sure what 'redic' means, but I agree, burning someone to death is not good. However, I do take into account that Dorner's actions directly led to his own demise. The response teams onsite do not have the luxury of, "assuming he was dead" when that single gunshot was fired. They have to assume the worse, which is not that he took his life, but that he took the life of a hostage. Suffice it to say, there is much, much more that LE has to deal with in these scenarios then you, me, or the general public will ever be able to fathom. Just know that, although you may not agree or understand why police/LE do what they do in these situations, they do things with the preservation of public safety first and foremost in their minds. With that regard, there is no such thing as, "a waste of resources".
LAPD didn't make any good tactical decisions from the news footage In my opinion. Did I miss something here? I don't believe the LAPD was involved in any way with how this ended. Big Bear is outside of their jurisdiction and they were not in, "hot pursuit". It was San Bernardino County Sheriff's and Fish & Game Wardens that were involved. But to your point, tactical errors are always a reality because every scenario is different.
I understand the "killer" aspect and wanting to protect the people. But this still seems fishy.
"tin foil hat on" Nice hat!
Also, from the manifesto he wasn't boo hooing as you say, from what it says they were being fairly cruel and racist not only to fellow officers but also to convicts/apprehended people. Just because you get a badge doesn't mean you get to beat on people when you like. We have a difference of opinion here. I've read his manifesto and in my opinion it does make him out to be a chronic complainer. Now, whether or not each and every situation was justified is not for me to discuss, because they are moot points with regards to his actions. The same goes for your comment about, "...a badge doesn't mean you get to beat on people when you like.". I completely and utterly agree with you, but again, that's not the point. The point is for all his rhetoric, NONE of it is a justification to start a killing spree.
Still, Criminal, psycho, or not, burning someone to death is redic, and if they heard a shot and assumed he was dead why fire tear gas into it. Honestly they should have quarantined the area of suspect, evacuated all the innocents, then waited it out with snipers or military units. Trying to "take him down" as they would say, only risks more lives and is a waste of resources. I'm not sure what 'redic' means, but I agree, burning someone to death is not good. However, I do take into account that Dorner's actions directly led to his own demise. The response teams onsite do not have the luxury of, "assuming he was dead" when that single gunshot was fired. They have to assume the worse, which is not that he took his life, but that he took the life of a hostage. Suffice it to say, there is much, much more that LE has to deal with in these scenarios then you, me, or the general public will ever be able to fathom. Just know that, although you may not agree or understand why police/LE do what they do in these situations, they do things with the preservation of public safety first and foremost in their minds. With that regard, there is no such thing as, "a waste of resources".
LAPD didn't make any good tactical decisions from the news footage In my opinion. Did I miss something here? I don't believe the LAPD was involved in any way with how this ended. Big Bear is outside of their jurisdiction and they were not in, "hot pursuit". It was San Bernardino County Sheriff's and Fish & Game Wardens that were involved. But to your point, tactical errors are always a reality because every scenario is different.
I understand the "killer" aspect and wanting to protect the people. But this still seems fishy.
"tin foil hat on" Nice hat!


Leave a comment: