ex-LAPD - Chris Dorner

[ethrtyiS]

it's quite amazing to me that chris' wallet survived the fire. almost as amazing as them finding his wallet, twice.

[Jean]

LOL^ What if there is a twin Chris? Have they done a press conference yet?

[DÌEGØ]

There was no way Dorner was ever coming out of this alive. He was destined to eat a bullet, either from his own hand or, "suicide by cop". He had already made this decision when he instigated his reign of terror.

Many of you want to believe a "conspiracy theory" regarding his demise, but be logical for a moment . Proper tactical training dictates the safest way to remove a barricaded suspect is to force them from the building. A breach of a barricaded suspect is the last resort as it is the most deadly. Even then, the tactical team needs as much intel about the property before entering (i.e. booby-traps, # of suspects, # of hostages, etc.)

Given Dorner's background and training in military and LE and his willingness to use firearms, the last thing LE would do in this situation would be to enter the cabin. He had already engaged deputies in a gun battle, wounding two, one of which died later.

In this situation, forcing the suspect from the property would be the safest way to extract Dorner. Tear gas is the best tool for the job. Unfortunately, like most explosives, it burns very hot. Like welding torch hot. Most likely, this is what caused the cabin to burn.

Unfortunately, Dorner didn't exit the building and at some point it appears he took his own life. Ironically, I'm sure this played a role in keeping police and fire units from entering. Not knowing if there were booby traps or Dorner's status would be bad news for anyone attempting to enter the cabin. Once the rounds inside the cabin started, "cooking off", further entry by police and fire crews was impossible.

Theres just things that dont add up, if you wanna call it a conspiracy theory?

1. They used incindiary tear gas they knew would very well start a fire.
2. If they wanted to smoke him out why push down the walls and let fresh air in?

Not saying he was right but there are some inconsistencies and after lapds actions (shooting innocent people?) he might have been on to something.

[Ayman]

Uhhh, please tell me youre joking. The guy already killed multiple people and was pretty convincing in his manifesto that he was going to kill as many officer as he could. Hell he just shot 2 deputies moments before. Did you really think he was just going to walk out with his hands above his head? There was a fire fight going on he just happened to die from the actual fire instead of the bullets.

No, he wanted to kill the cops that were involved in his whistle blowing incident. Not just as many officers as he could.

[CabbE30]

I believe he's still alive

[Dozyproductions]

Is this going to be the next free tookie thing or something?

[imsotyerred]

Theres just things that dont add up, if you wanna call it a conspiracy theory?

1. They used incindiary tear gas they knew would very well start a fire.
2. If they wanted to smoke him out why push down the walls and let fresh air in?

Not saying he was right but there are some inconsistencies and after lapds actions (shooting innocent people?) he might have been on to something.

Might have been? It's not like this is the first time that the LAPD has done shady shit abusing their power in the name of 'justice,' Ice Cube told me so

[Thizzelle]

i watched a video of cops shooting. seemed like a lot of bullets and nothing was hit. I think they were just shooting to shoot, it was pretty bad.

[Ayman]

I believe he's still alive

I hope he is. I don't want him to kill more people but I'm not ready for this shit to be over yet. Cops are being shady af and if he's found to be alive then it just proves that lapd is full of pigs.

[Cha Ching]

Theres just things that dont add up, if you wanna call it a conspiracy theory?

1. They used incindiary tear gas they knew would very well start a fire.
2. If they wanted to smoke him out why push down the walls and let fresh air in?

Not saying he was right but there are some inconsistencies and after lapds actions (shooting innocent people?) he might have been on to something.

There is no such thing as, "incendiary tear gas". You're probably repeating what uninformed or misinformed media are representing to the public. Also, what do you mean, by, "If they wanted to smoke him out..."? They aren't trying to smoke anyone out. The purpose of tear gas is to get the suspect to walk out under his own accord. Where are you getting this information about pushing walls down to, "...let in fresh air"??

You also appear to be mixing agencies. LAPD had nothing to do with the shootout at the cabin, it's outside their jurisdiction. Several agencies were involved including LA County Sheriff's and Fish and Game Wardens.

[travish325]

Have you ever tried walking out on your own accord while being tear gassed? lol


Good luck with that.

[Mr. Burns]

super interesting stuff going on...

Dorner is being touted as a Hero, despite the killings throughout many groups.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/dorner-online-article-1.1263907

page after page of support for him on FB too...

https://www.facebook.com/#!/search/results.php?q=chris%20dorner&init=quick&tas=0.03823967240260684

he's not going to be forgotten anytime soon that's for sure.

[Cha Ching]

What I find disturbing are the comments from people who say, "the cops are being shady", or, "the LAPD are all corrupt". Really? What do you base your information or opinion on? And why would you label an entire organization based on your interaction with a select few (and realistically isolated number) of individuals? Isn't this a form of discrimination?

[Cha Ching]

Have you ever tried walking out on your own accord while being tear gassed? lol


Good luck with that.

Yes, I have and you're right, it's not fun! Haha, but that's the whole point of TG, right?

[Mr. Burns]

What I find disturbing are the comments from people who say, "the cops are being shady", or, "the LAPD are all corrupt". Really? What do you base your information or opinion on? And why would you label an entire organization based on your interaction with a select few (and realistically isolated number) of individuals? Isn't this a form of discrimination?

Last nights Anderson Cooper's 360 on CNN had a special guest...former LAPD officer, who shed alot of light on exactly what you're talking about.

reveling argument can still be debunked, is that his experience from being on that force stems from the mid 1990's...supposedly nothing has changed?

http://www.eurweb.com/2013/02/ex-la-cop-brian-bentley-on-dorner-manifesto-not-only-do-i-believe-it-but-i-lived-it/

yet, I could just be feeding myself into the media frenzy...which is what I do.