New 007? Guess I'll be tapping out now ...
Collapse
X
-
^
Again, not taking the role of James Bond, just taking over as 007, different concepts. It's a movie, so people can deal with it and be entertained or they can choose to get their panties in a bunch over something that does not actually impact them as all.
As far as I am concerned, amyone can play any part as long as they do a good job and the movie/show is enjoyable, otherwise they should be replaced.Leave a comment:
-
A white chick plays a robot in Ghost in the Shell....SJW's are up in arms. Black chick takes the role of James Bond....wowequalityisgreat.Leave a comment:
-
would this be the adadicktome or the lopadickoffame procedure?
i think the chick(legs and ass) on the For your eyes only movie poster was a dude.
personally, i was a big fan of the Daniel Craig movies. i liked the edginess of them. Connery is like 90. i think a Bond movie in an old folks home would be quite the flop.Leave a comment:
-
might has well of had a trans person play 007 just to really fuck with em lolLeave a comment:
-
^^
Since we have already seen 00x agents get another person's number when someone is KIA or retires this is the correct take. The books make this quite clear IIRC, although I don't remember any mention of female agents, but we are of course dealing with a modern/updated reinterpretation, based in the world of today where there are plenty of female intelligence agents, not just a slavish copy of the novels.Leave a comment:
-
-
007 is the code name (number) to a fictional spy character. No one ever said it had to be a male actor playing the role.
It would be different if she was playing James Bond, but James Bond does not equal 007.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
I think it would be only be appropriate that the the next wonderwoman is a wonderman.Leave a comment:
-
Not sure who "Brie Larson" is, but she clearly wouldn't get nearly as much buzz as Lashana.Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: