People obviously did not quite read my argument to the fullest. The church has no bearing in this argument. There is only one current doctrine that prohibits same-sex marriage or 'union's and that is Catholocism. If the only people that hated homosexuals were Catholics, then same-sex marriage would be legal. As a matter of fact, if you wanted to contribute to the church, anyone who performs premarrital sex, says G-D, pisses in your neighbors lawn, etc... is going to go to hell. Being religious from the age of 72 to 77 when you die doesn't nessacarily justify a life full of sinful acts. Again, the church has no bearing on this act. In Italy, of course it does, considering 96% of the population is Roman Catholic. In American its less than 20%.
I have been told the argument that procreation, or sexual intercourse whether it be anally or vaginally is for recreation. I can throw this one at you as well; why do men seek to have anal sex with their wives? For the majority of people, sex is used for recreation. For some (Amish and FLDS) it is used only for procreation. The point of the matter though is what is the foundation behind sexual intercourse. Its a matter or procreation, not recreation. You don't have to put a condom on because it feels better, you do it because it stops you from having a child in 9 months. The fact of the matter though is that it feels so good, many of us desire to have sex more often than we would be able to have children. The point I am making is that the human body was never set up for homosexual intercourse. Its a change that people make, to the point of having surgeries, to make it happen. Do they not realize that if you have to use a half gallon of astrolube to make anal sex feel good, it probably shouldn't be happening.
As far as who is homosexual, I think there are millions of variations. The 1991 publication of the 'homosexuality' gene was the closest I have ever seen to the argument coming to an end. Even better than the 'I know plenty of good familied gay people' is the fact that nearly 90% (I think 88 or 89) of woman have desires to engage in sexual activites with another woman. This is often why you see girls kissing at parties when they are drunk, because without any inhibitions they can do what they want. Woman though on the other hand aren't nearly as likely to seek marital status as men are. My idea is that its the wrong choice, something isn't clicking right. If there was a 'gay gene' then it would solve the argument and the world could go forth seeking equallity. The problem is the 'gay's want it to be a choice, a freedom. Sorry guys, but you can't have your cake and eat it too.
I am not saying that homosexuals need to be hung from a tree or dragged behind cars. I think that is radical and in no way shape or form do I condone people that do that. I don't think that they should have equal rights under our constitution though. Thomas Jefferson would be rolling in his grave. I have plenty of gay friends, mostly lesbians, but I tell them to their faces that. Some agree, some don't. I am telling you here and now though that its a moot point. The Supreme Court nor the US Senate is going to hear cases dealing with this because they can't handle the publicity. Until there is a panel of strict reconstructions (rulling it illegal) or strong reformists (ruling it legal), it will never change. So while Massuchusets gives homosexual couples the same rights under their state laws, here in good ol' NC, they are prohibited.
Wes
I have been told the argument that procreation, or sexual intercourse whether it be anally or vaginally is for recreation. I can throw this one at you as well; why do men seek to have anal sex with their wives? For the majority of people, sex is used for recreation. For some (Amish and FLDS) it is used only for procreation. The point of the matter though is what is the foundation behind sexual intercourse. Its a matter or procreation, not recreation. You don't have to put a condom on because it feels better, you do it because it stops you from having a child in 9 months. The fact of the matter though is that it feels so good, many of us desire to have sex more often than we would be able to have children. The point I am making is that the human body was never set up for homosexual intercourse. Its a change that people make, to the point of having surgeries, to make it happen. Do they not realize that if you have to use a half gallon of astrolube to make anal sex feel good, it probably shouldn't be happening.
As far as who is homosexual, I think there are millions of variations. The 1991 publication of the 'homosexuality' gene was the closest I have ever seen to the argument coming to an end. Even better than the 'I know plenty of good familied gay people' is the fact that nearly 90% (I think 88 or 89) of woman have desires to engage in sexual activites with another woman. This is often why you see girls kissing at parties when they are drunk, because without any inhibitions they can do what they want. Woman though on the other hand aren't nearly as likely to seek marital status as men are. My idea is that its the wrong choice, something isn't clicking right. If there was a 'gay gene' then it would solve the argument and the world could go forth seeking equallity. The problem is the 'gay's want it to be a choice, a freedom. Sorry guys, but you can't have your cake and eat it too.
I am not saying that homosexuals need to be hung from a tree or dragged behind cars. I think that is radical and in no way shape or form do I condone people that do that. I don't think that they should have equal rights under our constitution though. Thomas Jefferson would be rolling in his grave. I have plenty of gay friends, mostly lesbians, but I tell them to their faces that. Some agree, some don't. I am telling you here and now though that its a moot point. The Supreme Court nor the US Senate is going to hear cases dealing with this because they can't handle the publicity. Until there is a panel of strict reconstructions (rulling it illegal) or strong reformists (ruling it legal), it will never change. So while Massuchusets gives homosexual couples the same rights under their state laws, here in good ol' NC, they are prohibited.
Wes
R.I.P 07/01/09 - 04/23/10 :(
Comment