Bush Impeachment Hearing

[Lair]

It's all a big joke until he comes for you...

Don't worry, he's going to be too busy pushing for troops to be sent to Afghanistan. But I thought we didn't want to fight any more wars? .....

I thought when you start a war, you're supposed to finish it? It would be nice if we could bring that Bin Laden guy to justice too. It's only been 7.5 YEARS since he killed all those Americans.

Better get your tin foil on. Obama might be reading your brain waves.

[Lair]

at that rate, uofom3 will be at 10,000 posts by the weekend.

It'll be a nice contrast to his 68 IQ.

[Lair]

It's a great place, but I don't think you'd pass the entrance exam.

Thanks for the compliment. I've always been a big fan of the truth.

[Lair]

Obama wants more troops in Afghanistan.

We are winning in Iraq, even Obama admits it.

it's not the largest on record relative to the size of the economy... that's all that matters.

It's the largest on record, and it has to be paid. That's what matters.

How many times do we have to "win" in Iraq? Bush already "won" the war once. Why do we have to "win" it again?

Obama wants more troops in Afghanistan so he can finish the job that Dubya started. BTW, where's that Bin Laden guy?

Is he still "hiding"?

You guys kill me with this shit. Sometimes I think you're serious.

[Lair]

classic.

And true.

[Lair]

first of all you're ignorant, and already have been schooled on the fact that it's not enormous.

Just because it's a record of $400 BILLION doesn't mean it's enormous, does it?

There's no end to the enormity of your powers of denial, either.

Apparently you've been talking to your idiot rightwing compatriots for so long that you think EVERYONE is stupid.

[Aptyp]

at that rate, uofom3 will be at 10,000 posts by the weekend.

[uofom3]

What school do you recommend?

The Rush Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Bullshitting?

It's a great place, but I don't think you'd pass the entrance exam.

[uofom3]

Does "surplus to RECORD DEFICIT" mean anything to you, or are you too stupid to make the connection? Bush tanked a surplus and turned it into the largest deficit in HISTORY.

Republicans are great at starting unwinnable wars on multiple fronts.

Do you really want McCain to start new wars?

Obama wants more troops in Afghanistan.

We are winning in Iraq, even Obama admits it.

it's not the largest on record relative to the size of the economy... that's all that matters.

[uofom3]

Bush's best sucks ass.

classic.

[uofom3]

LMAO

Still no answer?

How will McCain shrink Dubya's enormous deficit while cuting taxes for the rich and starting yet another war?

first of all you're ignorant, and already have been schooled on the fact that it's not enormous. You dont' understand the concept of scale or relativity, so it's not really going to be helpful to enter your question.

Second, you don't understand how cutting taxes for the rich improve an economy. Fuck, I'm not even rich and I understand that cutting taxes for the top couple percent of money earners is good for the country. That would create natural wealth redistribution where those people consumed goods and services for others, but that would be a trickle down concept that clearly you don't buy into.

Honestly... tell me how much good it's going to do society to cut the taxes that are already extremely low (virtually non-existant) for the bottom 20% income earning households in this country. is that going to create jobs? fuck no. It's not going to do shit. It's going to put a negligably larger amount of money into their pockets that will translate into a minimal amount of money. Tax cuts for the rich, regardless who is president, translates into spending and growth of business. How hard is that to grasp? The tax cut for "poor" translates into a few extra bean burritos at Tbell... Tax cuts for the rich translate into vacations, retail sales, etc... all of which create far more opportunity for the "poor" than any tax cut. I'm even comming from the perspective of what would be BEST for the people in that bottom 20%.... I just don't understand how you can still harp on that.

Tax revenue goes up when you cut taxes.... so that would be a good place to start.

[uofom3]

That was a reply to an rwh11883355 post that mysteriously disappeared.
















I hope Obama doesn't start rounding up Jews if he's elected.

It's all a big joke until he comes for you...

Don't worry, he's going to be too busy pushing for troops to be sent to Afghanistan. But I thought we didn't want to fight any more wars? .....

[uofom3]

Sorry, age doesn't matter here. Your argument opponents are providing you with facts, facts that back up their arguments. Their arguments are well constructed and logical. You're arguments seem to consist of "Oh Yeah?"

Exactly.

By accepting the news stories that you are accepting and puking out that "record deficit" crap which if you are really 48 years old, you should remember that crap being used by the Dems and liberals every time there has been a Republican President, you are basically identifying yourself as a liberal. If you are not a liberal, then go ahead and call yourself a progressive if it makes you feel better.

Progressive would be worse, but it's not going to be good wither way.

Oh, and for the record, I am 45 years old and I was serving my country while some of these young people were in diapers. I wasn't sitting around seeing who could suck down that killer pot bud in one breath and drinking bong water.

ZING!

Less government is better government. Less regulations are better regulations. Fewer slack jawed liberals in control of this country will lead to a better country. It won't lead to a perfect country by any means because there are a lot of "conservative" politicians who are seriously corrupt and petty as well. All we can do is try and aim them in the correct general direction and stop trying to line our own pockets with government doles. Just let the economy work.

preach on brother...

There are other more radical things we should do too with government involvement in the economy, but that will have to wait.

Elaborate further....

[Hallen]

The republicans controlled Congress for 13 or 14 years. What grade were you in in 1993? 3rd?

Sorry, age doesn't matter here. Your argument opponents are providing you with facts, facts that back up their arguments. Their arguments are well constructed and logical. You're arguments seem to consist of "Oh Yeah?"

By accepting the news stories that you are accepting and puking out that "record deficit" crap which if you are really 48 years old, you should remember that crap being used by the Dems and liberals every time there has been a Republican President, you are basically identifying yourself as a liberal. If you are not a liberal, then go ahead and call yourself a progressive if it makes you feel better.

Oh, and for the record, I am 45 years old and I was serving my country while some of these young people were in diapers. I wasn't sitting around seeing who could suck down that killer pot bud in one breath and drinking bong water.

Less government is better government. Less regulations are better regulations. Fewer slack jawed liberals in control of this country will lead to a better country. It won't lead to a perfect country by any means because there are a lot of "conservative" politicians who are seriously corrupt and petty as well. All we can do is try and aim them in the correct general direction and stop trying to line our own pockets with government doles. Just let the economy work.

There are other more radical things we should do too with government involvement in the economy, but that will have to wait.

[Lair]

That was a reply to an rwh11883355 post that mysteriously disappeared.
















I hope Obama doesn't start rounding up Jews if he's elected.